Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters exactly as they appear in the image,
without the last 4 characters.
The characters must be typed in the same order,
and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
                       
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 20000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features
Topic Summary - Displaying 10 post(s). Click here to show all
Posted by: butthead
Posted on: Apr 6th, 2010 at 1:57am
Quote Quote
They are not in Topo8. I used,

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

bwca-portage-tracks.gpx

bwca-camp+port-wpt.gpx

import the with the draw map function.

Hope this helps.

butthead
Posted by: Paddle_Guy
Posted on: Apr 5th, 2010 at 6:18pm
Quote Quote
I recently purchased a Delorme PN40.  I have been super
impressed, but I've only used it for geocaching.  It has a bit of a learning curve, but it sure has a lot of cool features, like the Top8 maps that were included.

It does, however, seem to burn throught the batteries.

Butthead-Is the protage and campsite information already included in the Topo8 program.  How difficult was it to add that information to the GPS?

Thanks.
Posted by: azalea
Posted on: Mar 23rd, 2010 at 3:52am
Quote:
It isn't so much the technology dies as it is that it gets forced out of use as it becomes "obsolete" and is no longer supported.  I believe the marketing term is "planned obsolescence".  Is this a problem with GPS devices?


There is a big difference between a GPS and a computer with respect to them becoming obsolete.  A computer has various parts that can be replaced or upgraded as separate components.  There also is a huge variety of software titles available with the newer ones usually having limited functionality on older systems.  And the performance of computers changes drastically over the span of 8 years (although that rate of change is beginning to slow down).

Even if a GPS is no longer supported, unless it breaks it can be quite useful.  I suspect garmin's mapping software still works fine in 10+ old garmin units because the nature of the communications between computer and GPS is just not very complicated.  I suspect Garmin has updates for both my GPS and my GPS software but I never bother to check because everything I have, old as it is, works fine so if it ain't broke, no need to fix it.

In summary, a GPS is nothing like a computer in how quickly it becomes obsolete.
Posted by: butthead
Posted on: Mar 22nd, 2010 at 9:07pm
Quote Quote
Yes!
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Pxxx = portage point, Cxxxx = campsite, grey/white stripes are portage trails from the data sets.
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Map of BWCA with database overlay, Topo8.

butthead
Posted by: Mk631
Posted on: Mar 22nd, 2010 at 2:51pm
Quote Quote
I have had Garmin GPSMAP 76 series for quite a while and have been pleased.  I don't know about support - I replaced my 76 with a 76C, which is discontinued so I suspect there'll be no more firmware updates - maybe that's OK.  FYI, between the 76 & 76C, I like the color a lot, but dislike the reduced control over the fields displayed in a small area at the top.  I can load campsites & portage data easily, and have all the stuff to download it too, so I'm pretty stuck on Garmin.  I've also screwed up software driver installs and they've been very helpful at fixing my problems.

Butthead - the Delorme unit looks interesting - can you load campsite & portage data (i.e., from Azalea's Quetico/BW data sets?)

-Tom
Posted by: woodstripper
Posted on: Mar 21st, 2010 at 4:25pm
Quote Quote
OK... time for a confession:  I don't really intend to use the GPS in BW/Q.  I'll probably take it along, but I've got all the maps for those areas, and have never felt the need for anything other than traditional map & compass.

But I'm now planning to do more remote trips, some of them solo (WCPP this year, after that, who knows?).  For those trips, I want to have the ability to nail my position accurately, particularly if I get into trouble.  The other half of the equation will be a rented satellite phone.

I've looked into the SPOT, but have reservations about its reliability and genuine utility.  If I'm going to spend that much money, I might as well get a real GPS and dispense with the annual subscription fee.

WS
Posted by: Bart
Posted on: Mar 21st, 2010 at 12:28pm
Quote Quote
Woodstripper:
I do have a Garmin Map76 and have used it for close to eight(?) years.  It has been a very reliable unit for me with pretty decent battery life.  Fortunately, I have not had to test its ability to float yet, but keep it securely packed in a Pelican case when not in use.

Kind of like azalea, I have been thinking I need to replace it with a 'fancier' color unit maybe with a touch screen, but when I look at what the newer units actually do, I can't justify the cost to 'upgrade'.  Not as long as the Map76 does what I need it to do; get me from point A to point B.  I am also kind of like most others in that I still like to have that map out in front of me.  The GPS just affords me the straightest line and affirms my direction and on long days of paddling, it really helps.

My $0.02

Posted by: butthead
Posted on: Mar 20th, 2010 at 5:35pm
Quote Quote
I have and use Garmin GPS' but for canoe tripping and custom tailored mapping I use a Delorme PN40se.
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
The map subscription has maps, sat/aerial photos, marine charts, and 50K topos for Canada.
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

topo and aerial displays of the bridge over the stream from Little Jhon to McFarland.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Kenny Lake, Quetico, 50K Canadian topo.

butthead
Posted by: woodstripper
Posted on: Mar 20th, 2010 at 12:22am
Thanks to everyone for the posts!  I did some more searching and found that the Garmin 60 and 76 are both equivalents with the same guts, software, etc.  The only difference appears to be in the case and buttons.  The 76 appears to have a larger case for the same weight, and it is the only one of Garmin's products that *they* claim floats.  Anybody used one?

Azalea:  Perhaps I've misjudged or mis-spoke.  About 30 years ago, I had an Apple II computer.  If I had kept it (and now I wish that I had!), it would, in all probability, still be functional.  But I doubt that I could get any service or software for it today.

It isn't so much the technology dies as it is that it gets forced out of use as it becomes "obsolete" and is no longer supported.  I believe the marketing term is "planned obsolescence".  Is this a problem with GPS devices?  A glance at Garmin's website finds "discontinued products".  Do they also discontinue support?

TCK
Posted by: azalea
Posted on: Mar 19th, 2010 at 2:55am
Quote Quote
Quote:
It looks like the technology half-life for these things is ~2 years,


I disagree with this.  I have had two GPS units: first a garmin 12map then a Garmin 60C.  If the 12map had not died, its capabilities would be serving me well today and it would be 10 years old.  The 60C gave me color and some bells and whistles, but nothing vital.

My 60C is around 6 years old now.  I could go for an improved model, but each time I have looked, the improvements were what I considered to be quite minor.
 
   ^Top