Marten wrote on Aug 12^th, 2010 at 8:24pm:


Hurrah for Martin. I say they take one of those unnamed lakes up there and put your name on it. 

I hope that Lund lake entry won't be all pick-up sticks next August. I have some unfinished business to attend to.

Good news and bad news.  The good news is that the portage exiting Lund Lake to the west has been replaced with an all new route. On the Lund side it is about 1100 meters to the NNE of the old portage. UTM using NAD 27 datum- 15U 408255 5662887. The other end is 800 meters NNE of the old portage- 407232-5662887.

The bad news is that the Lund entrance is closed for now because of the RED124 forest fire that started near Larus Creek.

I just returned home from 30 days in WCPP. The park does not even know this yet but I have fixes and reroutes for the three nasty portages west of Lund Lake. The fix for the Knox 1500 will require 55 meters of riprap. Not a wet foot other than that. Now it will only require money, time and red tape cutting to put an end to the misery up there.

P.S.  The road to Lund Lake was child's play.  My wife's 1998 Plymouth Voyageur took it at nearly 50 mph most of the way out!  We left in a cloud of dust and a "Hi Ho Silver!!  Away!!!" [/quote]

Now that's my kind of driving... I think you use twice the gas when you drive real slow, so we kind of pushed it too, just not 50mph. I thought of how I was glad to have a good amount of gas between Dryden and Ft Francis even though gas was quite high in Red Lake. We didn't have any canisters of white gas left... 

Kingfisher wrote on Aug 9^th, 2010 at 8:26pm:



Hey, we STILL had a cannister or so of the white gas cook stove fuel that might have gotten us down the road a little further!  As it was, the digital fuel gauge showed that we went about 12 miles beyond the tank's capacity.

It's a LONG stretch beteen Dryden & Ft. Frances!!  Fill up when you can!!!

Jimbo   

P.S.  The road to Lund Lake was child's play.  My wife's 1998 Plymouth Voyageur took it at nearly 50 mph most of the way out!  We left in a cloud of dust and a "Hi Ho Silver!!  Away!!!"

Hey folks, it's a good idea to fill up whenever you get the chance when travelling beyond the border.

nctry_Ben wrote on Aug 9^th, 2010 at 7:44pm:

This is where Jimbo chimes in to tell you our story of a close call.

I think the road going all the way to Lund Lake is relatively new. It will likely take a couple years to make it okay. I don't know what is going to be done to it in the next years time, but hey, it's part of the adventure. If your coming up late as we did, it might be a good idea to motel it one night and get an early start the next day. If your going in with say four people, the savings of one day out would likely pay for a room. Giving yourself more time keeps you from pushing it to fast on the rough road saving your vehical from to much damage to your suspention or tires. We, in our excitement of being in Red Lake totally blew off the gas gauge. We had less than an eighth of a tank to go 70 kilometers from Leano back to Red Lake on the rough road... We made it, but barely. We likely won't repeat that again.

woodstripper wrote on Jul 14^th, 2010 at 6:22pm:

I believe you are correct.  My expectations as to the conditions of portages was relatively low for my first trip.  I was actually quite surprised at the condition of the portages.  Although not generally a boulevard, I didn't find any difficulty following them or even finding them.  Based on conversations with both Doug and Claire, it was clear that the park is short on staff and some areas of the park don't get the attention they need.  For example, portages, on average, don't see a portage crew for four years.  (I've been contemplating entry via Garner Lake, Manitoba but it appears that area hasn't seen a portage crew for about 6 years.)  Furthermore, I suspect that the Leano/Onnie areas get more than their fair share of attention.  In these areas, clearly the park is expending a significant amount of their resources.  Compared to last year, the Leano entry was well marked, with new rip-rap through a boggy area just out of the parking lot and a well crafted plank bridge/boardwalk over another stream/boggy area.  And, on my exit, it appears that Onnie received even more resources.  Again, the signage was new and informative, but even more important, they extended what appears to be a brand new boardwalk for perhaps 100 yards from the parking lot over a serious boggy area.  Not only did it make my exit much more pleasurable, it also provided protection to the bog/swamp, which was actually quite beautiful.

dd

DD,

I was trying to be discrete.  The Lund Lake entry portages (and from what I hear a good part of the long one over to Knox Lake) are, in my opinion, in bad shape.  Each of these portages cross peat bogs, and this year has also been wet (though certainly not as bad as last year!).

The corduroy on these portages has been broken up by the high waters:  floated out of place in some locations, and stomped down into the peat muck in others.  It makes for difficult footing at best.

I discussed this with Claire after coming out, and I would like to give WCPP a season to scout out the condition of the trails and decide whether to reroute, repair, or leave them as-is before I put much "out there" about them. 

This was my first trip to WCPP, and my expectations may be out of line for such a remote area.  But even if the trails are really no worse than expected, I am concerned about the damage that is being done to the fragile bogs.

TCK