| QuietJourney Forums | |
|
Boundary Waters / Quetico Discussion Forums >> Strictly Gear - Gear specific reviews and ideas. >> SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
https://quietjourney.com/community/YABB.cgi?num=1251007369 Message started by azalea on Aug 23rd, 2009 at 6:02am |
|
|
Title: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks Post by azalea on Aug 23rd, 2009 at 6:02am
SealSkinz makes a number of kinds of waterproof socks. This is a review of the WaterBlocker sock. The socks are described as follows.
Quote:
I used these socks on an 8-day trip through the Allagash Wilderness Waterway. Under them I wore a thin liner sock. I thought the liner sock would increase comfort but as it turned out it probably was not necessary. The inner layer of the three layers built into the Waterblocker is itself a liner sock. So I was essentially wearing two liner socks. Over the socks I wore my self-draining wading boots For the first 7 days, I was thrilled with the socks performance. I "wet footed" throughout the trip, I even went swimming in my boots and socks. However my feet stayed drive, no matter how I immersed my legs in the water. When I removed the boots and Waterblockers, the liner sock and my feet were just minimally damp from perspiration. The system worked great giving me the convenience of wet-footing but the dryness of dry-footing. The only negative was after three days, my liner socks were rather aromatic. A quick wash dealt with that issue. I did not wash the WaterBockers themselves, except for a quick rinsing in the lake. On the last day, however, there was a problem. The Waterblocker sock comes to mid calf. The built-in liner sock only comes to the top of the ankle. So the upper portion of the sock only has two layers. The water proof "inner" layer is exposed for a few inches above the built-in liner sock. By the 8'th day, that waterproof layer had become as brittle as tissue paper. So when I put the socks on, the layer ripped and the socks were no longer waterproof. I wrote the company when I returned home. They replied "It is a common defect and is covered under our warranty." They are sending a replacement pair of socks. |
|
Title: Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks Post by Jim J Solo on Aug 23rd, 2009 at 1:37pm
I tried them too, but never had dry feet at the end of the day. I was very carefull rolling the top blocker layer back each time I put them on. Maybe the waterproof layer laminated in the sock failed??? I was doing the Cashe Lake portages, so maybe I hiked in them more than they were built for. Regardless not a bombproof design IMHO.
|
|
Title: Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks Post by solotripper on Aug 23rd, 2009 at 6:04pm
I debated about getting these before I settled on the Brookie Knee Highs.
Obviously from the warranty, it's a common problem. Still as long as they back them in full, sooner or later, maybe they'll find a fix for the "brittle" problem? |
|
Title: Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks Post by PhantomJug on Aug 23rd, 2009 at 6:17pm
One of my "Top 10 Truths" of wilderness camping.
Waterproof isn't. |
|
Title: Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks Post by HowardSprague on Oct 21st, 2009 at 2:04pm
I only have the cheapass SealSkinz version, something like $20 from Sportsmans guide (I know, these aren't as good) and I also have Chota Brookies. As for the "aromatic" aspect, I think for that reason I wear good wool socks underneath either. More comfortable than a thin liner sock too.
|
|
Title: Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks Post by kheya shunka on Oct 22nd, 2009 at 9:48pm
I lost one of my sealskinz socks and that is a bummer at the price..
I like them on summer trips with my keen sandals, no biting bug can get through a sealskinz. I will probably get another pair as bug armour. Waterproof ? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :( :P |
|
Title: Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks Post by old_salt on Oct 23rd, 2009 at 2:59pm
That's how I use them. No biting flies can penetrate them!
|
|
Title: Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks Post by quietjourneyman on Nov 2nd, 2009 at 10:45pm
I stubbornly used my SealSkinz WaterBucket socks for six years so as to force down the cost per year. For the first two years I was convinced it was user error, so I tried shaving my ankles and duct tape. The third year I avoided submersion, but that didn't work either. The waterproof film layer had become brittle and broke. After three more years, the average cost was down and I had past the test of endurance. So long WaterBucket socks!
|
|
Title: Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks Post by db on Nov 4th, 2009 at 8:33am
My wife and I have some similarly purposed GT socks. All five pair continue to have their changing yet acceptable merits after a dozen+ or so years. My go-to pair is a Cabela's brand but I also have rain pants with velcro/neoprene seals. I consider myself to be dry - enough - until mired in unforeseen circumstances....
|
|
QuietJourney Forums » Powered by YaBB 2.6.0! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |