db wrote on Jul 17^th, 2010 at 6:28am:

---------------------------- We interrupt this rare moment of jocularity for an important message... db wrote on Jul 12th, 2010 at 6:22am: I see the lead misinformation is still up. Can't that and the $11.00 factual error be changed with a few keystrokes? The $3 is no big deal but as lung as someone has the file open.... I for one am happy to see the factual errors I first mentioned in Ted's article have since been modified. I still disagree with the general drift of the opinions expressed but simply making the article lead-free instead of Quetico is a huge improvement IMO. Cudos Ted. I appreciate it.  [smiley=thumbup.gif] On the thick skin tangent, if someone want's to feel slighted or get mad about the manner in which someone tries to help them, that's up to them. Life's too short to hold a grudge. Carry on. ---------------------------- Hey Wally, since Lush was off today ... who told you you could ... ahhhh I get it, satire like the master's. Good one! Still, someone will believe it I'm sure yet it's all a big conspiracy intended to confuse the little people. Ya, that picture must be old but I'm sure O_S is on the left and DD is on the right. I've met them both and that's an indisputable fact.  ;)

Hey Db,

I really appreciate that kudos and thanks for correcting me.  The wording in the fee chart is very confusing and I thought I had it straight, but your post made me look at it more closely, and I realized I was wrong.  

You guys probably thought I hit the road for good after all the negative comments.   ;D, nope, I am still here and will post more in the future.  Look forward to some great conversations with you guys in the coming weeks.