| QuietJourney Forums | |
|
Boundary Waters / Quetico Discussion Forums >> General Boundary Waters / Quetico Discussion >> QPP management plan comments
https://quietjourney.com/community/YABB.cgi?num=1287120282 Message started by db on Oct 15th, 2010 at 5:24am |
|
|
Title: Re: QPP management plan comments Post by Arctic on Oct 24th, 2010 at 6:14pm Kingfisher wrote on Oct 16th, 2010 at 1:31am:
I met a group of junior rangers on Mc Dougall Lake this summer. They were in the process of documenting with GPS every campsite in Quetico. My impression from talking with them is that there will eventually be designated campsites in Quetico. For those of you who think that public opinion always drives decision making, you should recalibrate. Public input is often just a formality. Establishing designated sites in Quetico would not be the end of the world, as countless sites have been there for centuries. Rarely is there a need to cut a campsite. There are quite a few sites on small islands that should be closed, and requiring the use of designated sites would enable that. While I can understand higher user fees for the southern entry points, as they are probably more expensive to operate, I've never liked the disparity between "Resident Canadians" and "non-Residents". I see plenty of Canadians visiting US national parks, but they pay the same fees that everyone else does, which seems fair. As for aircraft access and outfitting being geared toward Atikokan area businesses, that's fine. It's an Ontario park and support for the preservation of Quetico (and other parks) needs to come from local businesses. For decades its been Ely and Gunflint Trail area outfitters who have benefited the most from Quetico. Frankly, there are probably too many outfitters competing for the number of clients available in that mostly seasonal business, anyway. |
|
QuietJourney Forums » Powered by YaBB 2.6.0! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |