I know its pointless to try and change ST's mind once he has something in his head.......and instead of the correct response which would of been> "hey, thanks MT for taking the time to post that link, it sort of opened my eyes to the slightest possibility that what I have been told by the PBS nature documentaries might not be entirely true and even though I hate your guts I know your not a liar and if you say you have read many accounts of wolves killing indiscriminately I might be inclined to search out the issue and see for myself what the real truth is.........maybe its somewhere in between, that wolves only kill what they need, until they decide to go on a binge and kill just for the fun of it."

That was response "B". Instead, as per usual, you double down on your way or the highway.

BTW......the author of the article, instead of bringing into question the substance of his arguments you attack him on a personal level. That has a very familiar ring to it from my vantage point. Anyways, I personally I believe that the real conservationists have always been hunters, fishermen and trappers who work to set land aside for what they love to do and nobody but nobody wants abundant and healthy populations of animals more than these folk .

Hey and one other thing.......why does Canada have managed wolf hunts? Geez, do their biologists have it wrong and PBS has it right? Why do they feel the need to thin them out by 1/2 or more? I wonder why that would be? Hmmmm?