SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks (Read 5129 times)
azalea
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1084
Location: North Carolina
Joined: Jan 13th, 2004
SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
Aug 23rd, 2009 at 6:02am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
SealSkinz makes a number of kinds of waterproof socks.  This is a review of the WaterBlocker sock.  The socks are described as follows.

Quote:
An in-cuff seal* blocks water from entering over the top of the sock, even when wading through deep water.

SealSkinz® socks have a patented fabric structure of three highly engineered layers including a membrane capable of allowing perspiration to escape while not allowing water to penetrate.


I used these socks on an 8-day trip through the Allagash Wilderness Waterway.  Under them I wore a thin liner sock.  I thought the liner sock would increase comfort but as it turned out it probably was not necessary.  The inner layer of the three layers built into the Waterblocker is itself a liner sock.  So I was essentially wearing two liner socks.  Over the socks I wore my self-draining wading boots

For the first 7 days, I was thrilled with the socks performance.  I "wet footed" throughout the trip, I even went swimming in my boots and socks.  However my feet stayed drive, no matter how I immersed my legs in the water.  When I removed the boots and Waterblockers, the liner sock and my feet were just minimally damp from perspiration.  The system worked great giving me the convenience of wet-footing but the dryness of dry-footing.  The only negative was after three days, my liner socks were rather aromatic.  A quick wash dealt with that issue.  I did not wash the WaterBockers themselves, except for a quick rinsing in the lake.

On the last day, however, there was a problem.  The Waterblocker sock comes to mid calf.  The built-in liner sock only comes to the top of the ankle.  So the upper portion of the sock only has two layers.  The water proof "inner" layer is exposed for a few inches above the built-in liner sock.  By the 8'th day, that waterproof layer had become as brittle as tissue paper.  So when I put the socks on, the layer ripped and the socks were no longer waterproof.

I wrote the company when I returned home.  They replied "It is a common defect and is covered under our warranty."  They are sending a replacement pair of socks.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jim J Solo
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1192
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Joined: Apr 6th, 2007
Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
Reply #1 - Aug 23rd, 2009 at 1:37pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I tried them too, but never had dry feet at the end of the day. I was very carefull rolling the top blocker layer back each time I put them on. Maybe the waterproof layer laminated in the sock failed??? I was doing the Cashe Lake portages, so maybe I hiked in them more than they were built for. Regardless not a bombproof design IMHO.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
solotripper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 7980
Location: clarkston MI
Joined: Mar 14th, 2005
Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
Reply #2 - Aug 23rd, 2009 at 6:04pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I debated about getting these before I settled on the Brookie Knee Highs.
Obviously from the warranty, it's a common problem.
Still as long as they back them in full, sooner or later, maybe they'll find a fix for the "brittle" problem?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PhantomJug
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 2811
Location: 1/2 way there
Joined: Feb 12th, 2003
Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
Reply #3 - Aug 23rd, 2009 at 6:17pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
One of my "Top 10 Truths" of wilderness camping.

Waterproof isn't.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
HowardSprague
Ex Member


Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
Reply #4 - Oct 21st, 2009 at 2:04pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I only have the cheapass SealSkinz version, something like $20 from Sportsmans guide (I know, these aren't as good) and I also have Chota Brookies. As for the "aromatic" aspect, I think for that reason I wear good wool socks underneath either. More comfortable than a thin liner sock too.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kheya shunka
Ex Member


Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
Reply #5 - Oct 22nd, 2009 at 9:48pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I lost one of my sealskinz socks and that is a bummer at the price..

I like them on summer trips with my keen sandals, no biting bug can get through a sealskinz.  I will probably get another pair as bug armour.

Waterproof ?  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Sad Tongue
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old Salt
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 4838
Location: Crossville, TN
Joined: Jun 17th, 2004
Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
Reply #6 - Oct 23rd, 2009 at 2:59pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
That's how I use them. No biting flies can penetrate them!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
quietjourneyman
Lurker
Offline



Posts: 5
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 20th, 2007
Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
Reply #7 - Nov 2nd, 2009 at 10:45pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I stubbornly used my SealSkinz WaterBucket socks for six years so as to force down the cost per year. For the first two years I was convinced it was user error, so I tried shaving my ankles and duct tape. The third year I avoided submersion, but that didn't work either. The waterproof film layer had become brittle and broke. After three more years, the average cost was down and I had past the test of endurance. So long WaterBucket socks!




  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
db
Web-lackey
Inukshuk
Voyageur
Offline



Posts: 5414
Location: Just off the beaten path.
Joined: Sep 14th, 2002
Re: SealSkinz WaterBlocker socks
Reply #8 - Nov 4th, 2009 at 8:33am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
My wife and I have some similarly purposed GT socks. All five pair continue to have their changing yet acceptable merits after a dozen+ or so years. My go-to pair is a Cabela's brand but I also have rain pants with velcro/neoprene seals. I consider myself to be dry - enough - until mired in unforeseen circumstances....
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top