25 spot vs. sat phone (Read 13154 times)
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
spot vs. sat phone
Sep 23rd, 2010 at 9:14pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Am considering getting one of the spot satellite trackers for my wife (no, not to keep track of her Grin ) but rather for her peace of mind. I took for granted they worked well but was not impressed with reviews at one website.

Maybe I looked at an older generation model and they were old reviews or perhaps with unobstructed signal reception that one would get in a canoe the thing would work as advertised. It's either that or a satellite phone. Pros/cons :question
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
solotripper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 8105
Location: clarkston MI
Joined: Mar 14th, 2005
Re: spot vs. sat phone
Reply #1 - Sep 23rd, 2010 at 10:14pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
When IC and her crew went to the Bushwhackers Jamboree, she included me on her Spot Messenger. She sent a test signal from her house and I confirmed I got the message.

For what ever reason, I never heard from her again.
So cost's aside, if peace of mind and reliability is key,, I'd go with the Sat phone.

Every Spec Ops unit as well as the terrorists use them, so if you need to call out or get message in, I'd say go with the best.

IF your wife has a problem with the cost, tell her she's worth it  Wink
Might get you a little Badda Boom Badda Bing before and after your trip Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
intrepid_camper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1348
Location: Northern Minnesota
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: spot vs. sat phone
Reply #2 - Sep 23rd, 2010 at 11:51pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
We have been happy with the SPOT device.  It was my fault that ST didn't get the messages, apparently when I added another recipient on my account it cancelled his link.  A double check while still at home would have solved that ahead of time.
The SPOT has been reliable in sending its signals for us.  Sometimes it takes a while for it to locate a satellite.  I set it out in the open at the shoreline of our campsite or on top of my packs while I am paddling.  I have found it works best if lined up to broadcast to the southern sky.  It will signal you when it has been able to send a message.  I generally use the "okay" check-in feature.  Tracking is nice too, but sends a signal every 10 minutes and ends up putting a lot of e-mails on one's account over the course of a few hours.
From looking at the map of where we have been vs the signal locations I can tell it is right on for location information.  The folks at home seem to really enjoy being able to see where we are at any given morning or evening.  The security of being able to send a signal for help if you need it, is nice for the camper.  Account cost for one year is about $100.00.
At times you would like the option of explaining why you need help, etc. and there is no option for that...yet.  A sat phone would allow detailed communication.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
intrepid_camper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1348
Location: Northern Minnesota
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: spot vs. sat phone
Reply #3 - Sep 24th, 2010 at 12:00am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Here is a snapshot of our SPOT signals from the last trip:

I edited out several points which were duplicate signals from the same location.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: spot vs. sat phone
Reply #4 - Sep 24th, 2010 at 1:18am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
intrepid_camper wrote on Sep 24th, 2010 at 12:00am:
Here is a snapshot of our SPOT signals from the last trip:

I edited out several points which were duplicate signals from the same location.


I would say that is "way to cool" but that sounds so juvenile. Perhaps something along the lines of "That will do very nicely" would be more in line with someone who just hit the big 50 this past summer. Can you say "mid life crisis"? (my wife would kill me if I picked up a twenty something and a red sports car so maybe I'll just go trippin  Wink )
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
intrepid_camper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1348
Location: Northern Minnesota
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: spot vs. sat phone
Reply #5 - Sep 24th, 2010 at 2:34am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Grin
Good luck! on the 20 something and sports car...trippin' is more likely doable and much safer for maintaining your comfortable, long term relationship.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlin55388
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1230
Location: Watertown, MN
Joined: Mar 6th, 2009
Re: spot vs. sat phone
Reply #6 - Sep 24th, 2010 at 7:00am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I have run both Iridium and Global star phones in the BW, neither of which turned my crank...cost, bulk, battery issues, and plain outright coverage issues. Made the switch over to a spot 2 this year and I am not turning back unless I go further north then well that is another story. Simple to operate and program, that my nine year old can cover it. All messages sent on its maiden voyage this summer, so the verdict is still out so to speak. The google earth links are pretty kool too. Now I we have true solitude and peace of mind for the outsiders at the press of a button, or rather buttons. And  the customizing options in the messages spice it up a bit yah know, and it all fits in the front pocket. Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: spot vs. sat phone
Reply #7 - Sep 24th, 2010 at 10:58am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
marlin55388 wrote on Sep 24th, 2010 at 7:00am:
Made the switch over to a spot 2 this year and I am not turning back unless I go further north then well that is another story.


Have there been "issues" further north?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
marlin55388
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1230
Location: Watertown, MN
Joined: Mar 6th, 2009
Re: spot vs. sat phone
Reply #8 - Sep 24th, 2010 at 12:15pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
The issue/s that I was speaking to would be any thing that one might run into with PU's/evacs. in the far north, where real time verbal contact would be more utilitarian than a email or text message....not with spot its self that I am aware of....but I have not done that research MT...so for me it is more of a timeline driven rather than a device issue due to the more substantial distances and therefore time of travel in that neck of the woods...I would still use the spot but I would also have a sat phone to accommodate that concern of mine; and I do not have that concern in the BW.  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
intrepid_camper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1348
Location: Northern Minnesota
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: spot vs. sat phone
Reply #9 - Sep 24th, 2010 at 2:14pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
There are a few extremely remote areas where SPOT doesn't work well, or at all, according to the SPOT website.  These are Arctic, Antarctic and some very remote islands in the ocean.  Unless you are going that far afield it shouldn't be a problem.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top