10 Champlain v. MNII (Read 10102 times)
kypaddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 308
Location: Kentucky
Joined: Oct 6th, 2007
Champlain v. MNII
Sep 2nd, 2011 at 6:39pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
OK, I want your thoughts.

I've paddled a Wenonah Champlain for several years and am comfortable with it. I'm about 200 lbs, and my canoe-less paddling partner is equally big.

This year, I'm paddling with a smaller guy (say 160) and he owns a MNII, which I've never paddled.

Should we take his canoe?

(We are going for 8-9 days in mid-September ... the other tandem in the party is a Bell Mystic ... probably up through Louisa and Glacier way.)

-- kypaddler
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Preacher
Contributer
Subscriber
Offline



Posts: 1327
Location: COTU
Joined: Apr 10th, 2010
Re: Champlain v. MNII
Reply #1 - Sep 2nd, 2011 at 7:03pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I'd go with the MN2, since you've never paddled one.

That weight difference will likely dictate who's in the stern, though the 18' length may mitigate this.  I was once tandemed in a 15' with someone 60# lighter than me.  He tried to put me in the bow, it was an interesting ride.

Heck, if you can convince the Mystic to take the Champlain you can play about comparing these similar Wenonahs.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wally
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1987
Location: Minni-soda
Joined: Apr 3rd, 2003
Re: Champlain v. MNII
Reply #2 - Sep 2nd, 2011 at 8:31pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
The II is a great ride.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kingfisher
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 8th, 2004
Re: Champlain v. MNII
Reply #3 - Sep 3rd, 2011 at 11:03am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I like the MNII over the Champlain almost anytime but especially with a lighter load. Yellowbird and I cursed our Champlain for 10 days on one trip. We both weigh under 175 lbs even with wet boots on and there was just too much bow exposed to the wind on the Champlain.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
kypaddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 308
Location: Kentucky
Joined: Oct 6th, 2007
Re: Champlain v. MNII
Reply #4 - Sep 6th, 2011 at 12:48pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Thank you for your input.

As far as: Quote:
too much bow exposed to the wind on the Champlain
, you've got that right. One year my bow-man weighed just a buck 55, and we took a long day trip (sans packs). On the return, the wind kicked up and was blowing us all over the place ... including blowing us backward at one point. I had to put a couple of (very flat) rocks in the front on the next portage to hold it down.

At that point I wanted to trade it in ...

And sure, it's a little slower (though I've never noticed much of a problem keeping up with other tandems).

But I do like the way it handles in waves. Looking forward to comparing that aspect to the MNII.

The only other canoes I've paddled from the stern have been an old aluminum with a keel and a little Jensen.

Anybody else own or have paddled a Champlain? Opinions, positive or negative?

-- kypaddler

.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
monjon
Senior Member
Offline



Posts: 342
Joined: Jan 29th, 2004
Re: Champlain v. MNII
Reply #5 - Sep 6th, 2011 at 1:29pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I own a MNII .  For the past 3 years my paddling partner has been a 160-170 pounder and I am about 210.  We have no problems with him as bowman and have paddled in some windy conditions.  I've also paddled with Wally who was closer to 240 back then ( he's more svelte now) and we took turns being bowman with no troubles.  The key is properly placing the packs so the canoe is balanced front to back and side to side.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
solotripper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 8077
Location: clarkston MI
Joined: Mar 14th, 2005
Re: Champlain v. MNII
Reply #6 - Sep 6th, 2011 at 2:16pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
The key is properly placing the packs so the canoe is balanced front to back and side to side.


  Wink Good advice for tandems or solo canoes.
    I can tell at a portage when I encounter other paddlers if their newbies or experienced paddlers by the way they load the canoe in relation to the size of the bow/stern paddlers.
Experienced paddlers will adjust the load/trim, side to side and bow to stern as mentioned.
They also take in account the weight of the paddlers. Many but not all will keep their packs below the gunnel's for maximum stability.
Rookies tend to just throw everything in and take off, with no regard for anything but getting on the water.
I remember watching some good old boys form Kentucky head out from the portage from Beaverhouse to Quetico one spring.
The bow paddler was at least a 300lb guy and had a couple of packs standing on end/side by side that he was using for a makeshift backrest.
The stern guy probably weighed 135 dripping wet. When they pushed off from shore the stern keel line  was out of the water Shocked
At the time there was whitecaps on Quetico lake and a stiff wind out of the NNE.
Neither was wearing a PFD. I still had mine on and mentioned the wind/water temps but the big guy just ignored me and off they went.
There partners in another tandem were more receptive to my advice. I asked them to put their hands in the frigid water and ask how far/long did they think they'd last if the went over?
A few seconds with their hands in the water and they looked at each other and donned their PFD's. Then I helped them trim out their substantial load and lash it in.
When I pushed them off I could see the first canoe wallowing in the whitecaps trying to get to the West side of Eden Isle for protection.
I'm sure they made it but I'm betting one or both of them needed fresh drawers when they got to camp that night Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Yellowbird
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1239
Location: Soddy Daisy, TN
Joined: Apr 19th, 2004
Re: Champlain v. MNII
Reply #7 - Sep 6th, 2011 at 3:13pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Kingfisher wrote on Sep 3rd, 2011 at 11:03am:
I like the MNII over the Champlain almost anytime but especially with a lighter load. Yellowbird and I cursed our Champlain for 10 days on one trip. We both weigh under 175 lbs even with wet boots on and there was just too much bow exposed to the wind on the Champlain.

My perspective began on day one, loaded and traveling.  It was a tracking issue.  The boat just seemed too squirrelly. I was surprized at the effort it took to keep the boat on a straight line, even with minimal wind influence.  KF took the stern on day two.  When asked how he liked the boat, his impression was alike to mine. 

Fishing wise (without travel loads), the Champlain is a stable boat and rides high over the waves.  When trolling deep over the large central lake basins, I felt more comfortable than with a boat having less wind exposure and better tracking.  On these days I prefer the stability, and don't care so much about tracking, since the trolling involves more zig-zagging and/or following the lake bottom contours.

-YB
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Wally13
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 330
Location: Bettendorf, IA
Joined: Jan 1st, 2008
Re: Champlain v. MNII
Reply #8 - Sep 6th, 2011 at 3:25pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
kypaddler - I have paddled my MN II since 1992. I am 206 lbs and most of my buds that go with me and sit in the bow are 190 -200. A MN II will handle that weight easily and like SoloTripper says ... just spread out your pack loads from bow to stern according to the weight of bow/stern paddlers and it is fine. Paddlers in my group have rented a Champlain from time to time and I have paddled it. Like Yellowbird said, I found it to certainly be more stable than my MN II, especially with heavy loads. However, it doesn't track nearly as well especially on very windy days. It also is quite a bit slower too.

Bottomline, I would go with the MN II.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jim J Solo
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1195
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Joined: Apr 6th, 2007
Re: Champlain v. MNII
Reply #9 - Sep 7th, 2011 at 1:57pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I tried the Champlain briefly, empty. It seemed to be a flat bottomed boat. The boat slid around when I ruddered it hard in the stern instead of craving a turn. Lots of initial stability, that's not what I really like. I find that's a fault in rough water. The Wenonah catalog does a nice job of explaining how different stability designs (initial/final) roll in waves.

Tripped in an older Minn II for a week. Found it shipped water at the bowman's hip very easy. Otherwise a very nice handling boat. Duh? Jensen design, feels like what I'm familiar with. Talking to Wenonah they say the center free board was raised some years ago. So it's probably a drier ride now.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top