WCPP August 8-22, 2012 (Read 5554 times)
Joe_Schmeaux
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 395
Location: Alberta
Joined: Mar 23rd, 2010
WCPP August 8-22, 2012
Sep 11th, 2012 at 2:11am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
This is Part 1 of a (planned) four-part trip report for WCPP. Part 1 is an overview. Parts 2, 3, and 4 will cover campsite data, portage info, and photographs, not necessarily in that order, and "when I get around to it".

Trip summary: 15 days, about 125 km paddling (plus side trips and exploring) and 8.5 km portages, solo. This was my first visit to WCPP.

Route: Put in at Beresford Lake, Manitoba, then into WCPP at Garner Lake, north through Jester Lake, Haggart Lake, Broken Arrow Lake, east through Haggart River, south along Adventure Creek, west again through Bulging Lake and Haggart Lake, then back out.

Dates: August 8-22, 2012

What I liked:

The solitude: I saw 3 other canoes in 15 days. But see below ...

The granite: This is precambrian shield canoeing, with much more exposed rock than in Q. It's not that wussy polished showroom granite either, this is the real thing, big weathered lichen- and moss-covered domes ...

The portages: (Seriously.) Some portages were an easy walk through the forest, some were an easy walk across a granite dome, but all the portages were pleasant walking and usually quite scenic. There were no seriously mucky patches on my route (ankle deep at worst), and only a few portages had sections steep enough that you needed to be careful with one or two foot placements. There was hardly any deadfall blocking the trails, and foliage ranged from "cleared" to "slightly overgrown". (Note: All of my portages had been cleared in 2010 or later, so if you attempt a route that the portage crews haven't seen in 3+ years, things might be a bit more challenging.) The portages were generally easy to find, usually marked with flagging tape, cairns, little inukshuks or other artistic embellishments. The trails were always easy to follow, and always well-cairned when the track wasn't obvious.

The wildlife: I didn't see any moose (unlike magicpaddler) or cougars (like mihun09 on CCR), but I did see a woodland caribou (rear end mostly, they spook easily). In my canoe at one of the portages, I also found the biggest dock spider I'd ever seen. It was about 8 cm across, and looked like a mini tarantula.

The fishing: No intent to damn with faint praise, but I consider anywhere that I can catch fish as "excellent" fishing. So WCPP rates as "Excellent". (Sorry - you'll have to go elsewhere for useful WCPP fishing info Smiley )

The bugs (absence of): Still bad in MB in August, but on the Ontario side of the border, almost all of the biters were gone when I came through. On a few evenings, I sat on the shore well past sunset without bug dope or mesh clothing and had no problems.


What I didn't like:

The airplane noise: Not too bad in the SW corner of WCPP (Jester Lake), but everywhere else I found the float plane noise significantly detracted from my enjoyment of the trip. On average, there were about three "close encounters" per day, either a plane loud and visible, or loud and annoying but not obviously visible. (Maybe if I'd turned around ...) From early in the morning 'til past 8 in the evening, each day, every day, worse (four or five planes) on Saturdays and Sundays.) And when one plane disappears, you start wondering when the next one will come, like waiting for the other shoe to drop. So if you're looking for a "quiet journey", you might want to reconsider whether WCPP is the destination for you. (See the link in pajeff's Sig Olsen post in General BW/Q discussion today for more on float planes.) 

The trash: It seemed like there was generally more trash at the campsites in WCPP than in Quetico. Normally you expect things to be a bit worse when you're within one or two days paddle from the parking lot, but even four or five days into WCPP, some of the campsites were still mini garbage dumps. I found one firepit full of empty beer cans, another with a bunch of discarded eggshells, and almost all firepits had some aluminum foil left in them. Maybe the fly-in access means everywhere in WCPP is within one or two days of the parking lot?

Will I go back? Without the float planes, the answer would be yes, definitely. As it stands, well, it's probably not on my planning list for next year, but I'll likely return eventually.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DentonDoc
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Dec 27th, 2003
Re: WCPP August 8-22, 2012
Reply #1 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 5:07am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Flagging tape courtesy of a young couple from Winnipeg (if it was on the route through Garner to Haggart).

Extra trash:  Seems like visitors from Manitoba are not of the LNT philosophy.  Yet, I've been on several campsites that hadn't seen any traffic in several years based on the growth in the middle of the fire ring.

Portage clearing:  Prior to last year, the route from Garner to Haggart hadn't seen a portage clearing crew in about 6 years.  I did get the benefit of portage clearing for about 1/2 of the Haggart to Garner route on the way out ... as was greeted by a nice new sign on Garner when I arrived.

Fly-in traffic:  Both Donald and Carroll, just north of your route, are major fly-in destinations (and one of the fly-in services operates out of Bissett ... just about due west of the top of your loop).  Haggart is also a fly-in lake (with a fishing cabin).  There are places in the park (e.g., southern section) which sees less fly-in/fly-over traffic because many of the lakes are smaller and no (fewer) outposts exist.  But it is interesting to have them fly over low enough you could toss a rock up and hit them.  There was a plan in the works last year to limit fly-in traffic to 5 locations within the park.  Perhaps that will get more traction sometime in the future. (I didn't see a float plane on my first trip, but did see them on the 2nd and 3rd.)

But, even with all of the down side issues, I'm still planning a trip back there next year.  This time I'll be using fly-in services both ways since I'll be headed to the north side of the park.

I do wish there was an area of canoe wilderness where you could go for guaranteed peace and quite!

dd
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Marten
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 546
Location: IL
Joined: Feb 7th, 2010
Re: WCPP August 8-22, 2012
Reply #2 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 3:33pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I congratulate you for trying one of the less used entry points for WCPP. It is also refreshing to hear that you had a lot of positive experiences along the way. The caribou sighting is a nice plus to the trip.

The float plane traffic you experienced seems worse than normal. As DD pointed out it may have been traffic to Carroll and Donald from Bissett. I have come to accept the planes because they are the taxi cabs of the area. We canoiest do not spend enough money to support a few outfitters in the area much less all those employed by the fishing camps. If the plan is put in place to limit planes to five landing places it will only affect the planes transporting paddlers.

I am looking forward to the rest of your report. I have had many enjoyable days in that SW region of the park. It will be interesting to hear about your observations.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Joe_Schmeaux
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 395
Location: Alberta
Joined: Mar 23rd, 2010
Re: WCPP August 8-22, 2012
Reply #3 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 7:14pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
DentonDoc wrote on Sep 11th, 2012 at 5:07am:
Extra trash:  Seems like visitors from Manitoba are not of the LNT philosophy.

I don't think Manitobans are more of a problem than visitors from anywhere else. The trashier sites I found were further into the park (Broken Arrow etc) rather than at the MB end (Jester to SW Haggart). Campsites on my only other trip to MB canoe wilderness (Rabbit River / Cole Lake in Nopiming last year) were pretty clean too, although that's one of the most popular weekend trips for Winnipeggers.

DentonDoc wrote on Sep 11th, 2012 at 5:07am:
But it is interesting to have them fly over low enough you could toss a rock up and hit them.

I didn't think of rocks, but Bruce Cockburn's song "If I Had A Rocket Launcher" did come to mind.

DentonDoc wrote on Sep 11th, 2012 at 5:07am:
This time I'll be using fly-in services both ways since I'll be headed to the north side of the park.

Et tu Brute?

Marten wrote on Sep 11th, 2012 at 3:33pm:
I have come to accept the planes because they are the taxi cabs of the area. We canoiest do not spend enough money to support a few outfitters in the area much less all those employed by the fishing camps. If the plan is put in place to limit planes to five landing places it will only affect the planes transporting paddlers.

Yes, this is the crux of the problem.

IMO once you allow float planes into the park, then WCPP is no longer "wilderness" (not even "managed wilderness"), but instead just a high-priced KOA. If WCPP wants to be a true wilderness park, it will need to get rid of the float planes, and that will mean dealing with the economic issues as well as renegotiating legal agreements with the camp operators who (I understand) do have agreed-upon rights to fly in to the park.

I don't have a feel for how much plane traffic is lodge access, how much is canoe shuttling, and how much is turboprop flyovers from Bissett and Red Lake. Maybe there's a way to at least limit the shuttles to the periphery of the park (preferably outside the boundary), or to reroute commercial routes?

Marten wrote on Sep 11th, 2012 at 3:33pm:
I am looking forward to the rest of your report.

The campsite and portage parts will be more of a reference for future paddlers, sort of a poorboy substitute for a PCD and a portage database. With your experience in the area, I don't think you will get much from those. The photos may first appear as PODs, but I still have to sort and cull them, and time is at a bit of a premium right now. Besides, September - October is prime hiking season in Alberta ...


As a postscript, somehow I forgot to mention one of the biggest positives of the trip: the WCPP park staff. Despite a limited budget and who-knows-how-much meddling from Queen's Park, they do a great job, and were a big help in planning my trip. They are the best !!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Marten
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 546
Location: IL
Joined: Feb 7th, 2010
Re: WCPP August 8-22, 2012
Reply #4 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 8:58pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  

DentonDoc wrote Today at 12:07am:
But it is interesting to have them fly over low enough you could toss a rock up and hit them.

I think this is something that could be addressed by the park. I can think of 3 times that planes came over my  head and just above the tree tops. These were not landing or takeoff situations and not a day with low cloud ceilings. I recovered from the sound blast but the caribou calf may not.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Joe_Schmeaux
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 395
Location: Alberta
Joined: Mar 23rd, 2010
Re: WCPP August 8-22, 2012
Reply #5 - Sep 25th, 2012 at 8:35pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Update:

The portage descriptions have been posted as a separate thread, "WCPP portage database".

Trip photos are here:
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Most (not all) of these will probably show up as PODs over the next while, but in case you can't wait ...

A couple of things I forgot to add to the initial post (gotta get better at this):
  - Water levels: Average to above average?
  - The weather: In 15 days you should expect a bit of everything. I got a bit of everything except snow.
  - Under trash: The dogshit. One dump at a portage landing, one at a campsite. Sad

Only one part left to do: the campsite "database". Soon!  Cheesy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BillConner
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 665
Location: Thousand Islands
Joined: Apr 12th, 2010
Re: WCPP August 8-22, 2012
Reply #6 - Sep 28th, 2012 at 6:23pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I love your photos.  You pick same subjects I do, but I think yours are better.  Camera gear?

Also, I noted your other comments but compared to Q, fewer or same or more people?  I'm always after the solitude and feel I might object as much to plane noise as you do, but also on the portages and lakes.

And dare to take a photo of yourself.  You'll be glad you did.  Only took me a few years to try it.  Was inspired by a speake at Canoecopia who showed a photolog of his solo from Batch to PP (?) in spring and I think one self portratit a day - and it was good.

Thanks for sahring!
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Joe_Schmeaux
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 395
Location: Alberta
Joined: Mar 23rd, 2010
Re: WCPP August 8-22, 2012
Reply #7 - Sep 29th, 2012 at 6:28am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
BillConner wrote on Sep 28th, 2012 at 6:23pm:
Camera gear?

Canon T1i with 55-250 and 18-55 zooms, sometimes with extension tubes (Zeikos), Hoya HMC circ polarizer, gorillapod & cable release. (That's all I bring). Everything goes into Photoshop afterwards, but only for straightening horizons and cropping (closeups are usually heavily cropped). There are no colour adjustments or other "fakes", but the sunsets are usually underexposed a stop or two.

BillConner wrote on Sep 28th, 2012 at 6:23pm:
compared to Q, fewer or same or more people? 

The entry points at Q are much busier, and after paddling one or two days into the park, Q is slightly busier. But if you pick your route carefully, you can find spots in Q that give complete solitude.

Without trying to rant TOO much, there was a good article in Canadian Geographic a few months ago on the importance of protecting wilderness areas from noise pollution, specifically with respect to Grasslands National Park (Saskatchewan):
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

A daily self-portait? LOL - even I'm not that self-indulgent Grin

But thanks for your kind comments!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top