10 Bing maps (Read 9625 times)
Joe_Schmeaux
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 395
Location: Alberta
Joined: Mar 23rd, 2010
Bing maps
May 8th, 2013 at 11:59pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Do any of you use Bing satellite photos for route planning?

Until now, I had used Google Earth to get a rough idea of the terrain of planned routes. But GE's resolution isn't all that great for most of canoe country, and it seems there's always cloud cover over the areas you want to look at.

Bing seems to have *much* better resolution than GE, and is now my preferred source for this sort of thing. (Am I the last to know about this?)

Anyhow, here's what the Ox Lake / Bearpelt Creek area looks like. You can zoom in (not sure how to fix the brightness adjustment) or move to somewhere else if you prefer.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

BTW, you want "AERIAL" not "BIRD'S EYE" to get the higher res. The traffic reports don't work in this area either.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DentonDoc
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Dec 27th, 2003
Re: Bing maps
Reply #1 - May 9th, 2013 at 1:49am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Yep, I just created a "mosaic" of the complete Sabourin River system in Woodland Caribou PP by splicing together a number of captured screen shots.

You can navigate around my click and drag to adjacent areas.

dd
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PhantomJug
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 2855
Location: 1/2 way there
Joined: Feb 12th, 2003
Re: Bing maps
Reply #2 - May 9th, 2013 at 2:49am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Bing is good except for instances like this.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Joe_Schmeaux
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 395
Location: Alberta
Joined: Mar 23rd, 2010
Re: Bing maps
Reply #3 - May 9th, 2013 at 8:55pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
DentonDoc wrote on May 9th, 2013 at 1:49am:
Yep, I just created a "mosaic" of the complete Sabourin River system in Woodland Caribou PP by splicing together a number of captured screen shots.

DD, what do you use for stitching your screenshots together?

For similar stuff in the past, I've occasionally used PTGUI - it's good for some things, but seems to do other unwanted stuff often enough that sometimes it seems more trouble than it's worth.

Lately, I've just been using the "brute force" approach - load a bunch of tif images into Photoshop as separate layers, skew and distort them as necessary to maximize alignment with an underlying topo map layer, then merge the whole bunch into one composite image. That's time-consuming, but at least it gives me full control in keeping the scale consistent with my topo map "projection".

Is Photostitch worth trying? Or Photoshop's built-in stitching algorithm? Or do you have a third, better way that you'd recommend?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DentonDoc
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Dec 27th, 2003
Re: Bing maps
Reply #4 - May 9th, 2013 at 9:11pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Brute force ... I'm using Photoshop.  But since I'm using a rather tight scale, I didn't have to skew/stretch anything on my last effort.

Here is a sample (in WCPP where the Sabourin River dumps into Thicketwood Lake):

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

I did tweek the color a bit to make it less blue and more green.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mk631
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1128
Location: Ohio
Joined: Sep 30th, 2004
Re: Bing maps
Reply #5 - May 10th, 2013 at 1:01pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Joe_Schmeaux wrote on May 8th, 2013 at 11:59pm:
... Am I the last to know about this? ...

You are not last, I was behind you!  I noticed PJ's use of an aerial I knew I hadn't seen in a thread yesterday & checked out Bing.
Some of Quetico is nice quality shot in fall color & very low water -- really interesting if you've been there to see the water levels, for instance in Deux River area or Olifaunt.
Some is missing high res.  Some high res is kind of crappy, as is some of the Google maps/Earth stuff.  I think Bing is ahead of Google in Quetico right now.
-Tom
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BillConner
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 665
Location: Thousand Islands
Joined: Apr 12th, 2010
Re: Bing maps
Reply #6 - May 12th, 2013 at 11:47am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I too found it inconsistent.  For instance, looking at my house, it seemed to be recent but when I zoomed in, to presumably highest resolution, it time shifted to 5 or so years ago, my new garage disappeared and the 2002 Tacoma I traded in 5 years ago reappeared.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Joe_Schmeaux
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 395
Location: Alberta
Joined: Mar 23rd, 2010
Re: Bing maps
Reply #7 - May 12th, 2013 at 4:51pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Weird.

It looks like they have (up to) two separate sets of photos: one at Google-res and another at high res, with the software switching between them depending on zoom level. Maybe that's the reason for the brightness change when you zoom in on the link I posted earlier.

I know there are gaps in the data - some areas have no coverage, areas much bigger than the missing section in PJ's screenshot. Apparently Microsoft acquired some 170 terabytes of data in June 2012, so hopefully it's an annual-budget-schedule-driven thing, and they will add another chunk of high-res coverage next month. Don't hold your breath on getting your new car back, though, Bill. Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BillConner
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 665
Location: Thousand Islands
Joined: Apr 12th, 2010
Re: Bing maps
Reply #8 - May 13th, 2013 at 11:11am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Maybe its a time machine in beta testing....
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
db
Web-lackey
Inukshuk
Voyageur
Offline



Posts: 5460
Location: Just off the beaten path.
Joined: Sep 14th, 2002
Re: Bing maps
Reply #9 - May 13th, 2013 at 5:42pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I liked the seasonal difference I saw when I zoomed.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top