kstarr215 wrote on Aug 14^th, 2009 at 5:31pm:


I like it. The slip on / bungi cord attachment looks alot easier and quicker than my improvised clamp on.

If a kayaker is paddling a kayak on Beaverhouse Lake while in possession of that portage yoke, would he or she be inside the boundaries of Quetico Provincial Park?   

Here is a picture of my kayak yoke. I have been using it for 4 years and it works well.

double post

Snow_Dog wrote on Aug 13^th, 2009 at 11:11pm:


Not me.  I want to try & sneak behind the curtain from time to time.

PhantomJug wrote on Aug 13^th, 2009 at 9:49pm:


But isn't that the point, PJ?  All us mere mortals care about is the laws that us mere mortals must follow.  The concerns of the gods are not the concerns of mere men.  We just try not to get struck by stray lightning bolts when a god awakens from his slumbers in a contrary mood.

I will have to check my dictionary on the definition of debate.  I don't think this was a debate.

If I put lipstick on BH would that put it inside the park?

Westwood

I will concede that there is some "gray area" here too.  It's kind of like going to the American tobacco store and asking "Where's the Cubans?"  "Cubans?  We don't have no Cuban's here"

Well, for some of us there are no Cubans in the store but for others . . . "I'll check in back.  Hold on."  

It was a great debate however - sure to go down in the annals of QJ history.

After PJ has called a "Official Time Out" to review the replay tape....I have decided one thing....PJ does have a "secret source" that makes him feel as if he's right.

Now I'm inclined to disagree with his source, but I do agree that a truce should be called.  But I will say that he's on thin ice...but yes, I will call uncle and concede to a truce

Quote:


I thought that was what got this whole thing going, ME quoting a "source" about the "issues" around Atikokan/Park
 Whoever wins the "jug", Wally or PJ, I think I should get a short snort out of it for "sparking" the discussion