Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters exactly as they appear in the image,
without the last 4 characters.
The characters must be typed in the same order,
and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
                       
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 20000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features
Topic Summary - Displaying 10 post(s). Click here to show all
Posted by: Ancient_Angler
Posted on: Mar 17th, 2011 at 1:27am
Quote Quote
What folks can do, though I can't, with Photoshop deserves scepticism.
Posted by: solotripper
Posted on: Mar 16th, 2011 at 10:36pm
Quote Quote
Ancient_Angler wrote on Mar 16th, 2011 at 8:55pm:
Solotripper, I did not mean to sound too "determinitive." You have good judgment.


A_A,

I'm more skeptical now than I ever was.
With the ability for "pranking" now mostly limited only by someone's computer skills, the old adage " Seeing is believing", no longer holds true Shocked

As for my judgment being good, that's a subject that's open for debate on any given day Roll Eyes


Posted by: Ancient_Angler
Posted on: Mar 16th, 2011 at 8:55pm
Quote Quote
Solotripper, I did not mean to sound too "determinitive." You have good judgment.
Posted by: solotripper
Posted on: Mar 16th, 2011 at 8:23pm
Quote Quote
A_A,

If it's good enough for your experienced eye, then who am I too doubt it.
dd's comment make sense, and the 2nd pic looks more " natural", so I apologize for being a little skeptical.
Posted by: Ancient_Angler
Posted on: Mar 16th, 2011 at 5:56pm
Quote Quote
I've caught muskies that big and pike almost as big. Looks authentic to me.
Posted by: DentonDoc
Posted on: Mar 16th, 2011 at 5:42pm
Quote Quote
Its just that this version of the fish looks more realistic.  Perhaps the other photo looks out of scale due to the camera angle (or a lens change).  This one looks to be 52 inches.  The other looks more like 70".

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Either way, its an impressive fish.

dd
Posted by: moonman
Posted on: Mar 16th, 2011 at 5:04pm
Quote Quote
Guys,

that pic is from the Swim True Flies website. Nick has been featured many times in various outdoor mags and is producer on a fly fishing films co. It might be Flymax films but not sure. I seriously doubt its a fake, but I guess you could contact the guy at swim true flies to check it out.

the website with the pic is here:

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Moonman.
Posted by: solotripper
Posted on: Mar 16th, 2011 at 4:50pm
mikea wrote on Mar 16th, 2011 at 4:01pm:
Nick is a stand up guy and one hell of a fisherman.....he wouldn't do that.....


I don't mean to impugn him as a person or a fisherman, but who's to say he wasn't the butt of a prank?

I found a on-line Muskie site that you enter length/girth if known and you get estimated weight. I don't know what they use for a calcualting point for girth, but I would say that muskie was fairly big in that regard.
Just entering length, it would way at least 40+ pounds.

Now I can't tell by picture, but it doesn't appear that Nick is a real big guy? Look how he's holding that huge fish. His right arm/hand from what I can tell is extended away from his body. Same with his left. He's kneeling on a boat deck. I never held a fish of that size, but I do know something about handling heavy weights from work/exercise. Unlike a solid weight, a live object is more like handling a sack of wet sand. It moves and shifts as you hold it. Try holding 40+ lbs of "loose weight" out away from your body, with your arms extended, kneeling on a surface that may/may not be bobbing up and down? A lot harder than you would think. I bet most people would have a hard time balancing in the position he's in under such a load.

Most pics of fish this size, the guy holding them is either using a two handed grip and holding the fish vertical off of his body, tight in to shoulder for support.
Either that, their clutching them with both arms/hands into chest for support/control.

Even the ratio of his right hand size looks off to his body size, unless he's, got hands like a NBA player?

Nice fish never the less, but the more I look the less authentic it appears.
Posted by: mikea
Posted on: Mar 16th, 2011 at 4:01pm
Quote Quote
Nick is a stand up guy and one hell of a fisherman.....he wouldn't do that.....

Mike
Posted by: DentonDoc
Posted on: Mar 16th, 2011 at 3:29pm
Quote Quote
solotripper wrote on Mar 16th, 2011 at 2:28pm:
Huh

I'm no expert, but does anyone else think that's been Photo-shopped?
Something seems off too me Undecided

The shadow cast by the fish seems inconsistent.

dd
 
   ^Top