Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters exactly as they appear in the image,
without the last 4 characters.
The characters must be typed in the same order,
and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
                       
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 20000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features
Topic Summary - Displaying 7 post(s). Click here to show all
Posted by: Old Salt
Posted on: Nov 2nd, 2011 at 9:21pm
Quote Quote
While I've never used fas-snaps, I've never had any problem with ball-bearing snap swivels. In fact, I tend to use larger than recommended sizes, and have always caught fish, even in crappy weather. To each his own... Cool
Posted by: mastertangler
Posted on: Nov 1st, 2011 at 11:15am
moonman wrote on Oct 26th, 2011 at 3:33pm:
If targeting panfish, I can see a use, but just asking here - are you guys saying these things won't open up on a good fish or snag? Is it that much harder to use a good cross-lock snap?

Moonman.



Moonman
I have been using these for over 20 years and have never had one open up. Of course I use these specifically for light line applications.....primarily cranks which have much better action with the light stuff.
These are far stealthier than crosslock snaps as well. Tiny by comparison. What I especially like about them is I am able to tie light line and get a solid connection. For example.......the thought of tying 6lb test to a split ring on a tail dancer is out of the question in my book. But I can pull it off with ease with these little clips. It is all about matching the diameter of the mono to what ever I'm tying to. 6lb makes a general poor connection to an oval shaped split ring IMO.

That example is more of a specialty application (calm, sunny day and I still want walleye) but why not have all my cranks rigged with the clips? They work just as well with 8lb test. At 10lb and above I omit the little clips and tie direct to rings. BTW, I don't take them on and off but leave the clip on the lure and retie. No bigey since I retie often anyway.
Posted by: Preacher
Posted on: Oct 26th, 2011 at 3:40pm
Quote Quote
They seem sturdier than a snap.  I've had snaps fail.  I used to prefer tying directly, but these may change my preference.  Next season will be the test.
Posted by: moonman
Posted on: Oct 26th, 2011 at 3:33pm
Quote Quote
If targeting panfish, I can see a use, but just asking here - are you guys saying these things won't open up on a good fish or snag? Is it that much harder to use a good cross-lock snap?

Moonman.

Posted by: db
Posted on: Oct 26th, 2011 at 5:56am
Quote Quote
I still have some of those ... use to love 'em. We use to use them w/ live bait rigs and when pan-fishing. They also come with swivels attached. They always worked well but these days... they are kind of small and hard to see and so really hard tie a knot to.
Posted by: jaximus
Posted on: Oct 25th, 2011 at 10:47pm
Quote Quote
amen to that. battlefield 3 and modern warfare 3 are coming out sooo soon!!!
Posted by: Preacher
Posted on: Oct 25th, 2011 at 7:44pm
Quote Quote
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

I think it was Mastertangler who brought these to my attention.  Was at BPS and gave them a try on a 3 day camp & fish last week.  Awesome!  Tough to get on some lures, Rapalas and anything with a thick eyelet.  I'll need to put split-rings on them. 

The fishing sucked, so did the weather.  We bugged out on day 3.  Fishing in crappy weather beats work any day.  Playing XBox warm & dry beats lousy fishing in crappy weather.   Cheesy
 
   ^Top