PhantomJug wrote on Aug 14
th, 2015 at 5:01pm:
ST, I think that as long as you continue to categorize vs. identify with people you consider different, strange, wrong or weird, you probably won't get what we're talking about. Like I said before, I hear what your saying but I'm not sure you can hear what we are saying.
I don’t think I’m categorizing the guy at all other than that I would think most people would consider that behavior “suspect” at the very least. I can “identify” with him, because like many people I did somethings that others thought weird at the time, the difference being I didn't need others to help me take care of myself and wasn't under the influence of ANY substance.
Forget the different/strange/wrong/ weirdness issues OR the he's okay those are purely speculative on everyone part.
Look at the facts. He did break the law as trivial as that may or may not be depending on your viewpoint? He either knowingly did it, or he didn't realize he did it? Both could be signs of issues that MIGHT need addressing? He got in way over his head in the woods, that may or may not be a sign of more serious issues?.
I look at these type situations this way. Let’s say MY concerns are valid and the guy gets persuaded to at least talk to a professional who deals with issues like this all the time. Best case scenario he gets a clean bill of “health” and that entire helping neighbor/ brother’s keeper thing is helping him cope and find his way.
Worst case scenario, he has mental health issues/substance abuse problems and they never get properly addressed and fixed. That means that all his well-meaning friends/brother keepers end up being part of the problem and not the solution.
By helping him out of the goodness of their hearts without ruling out those issues I mentioned, they end up in the long run being enablers who allow him to survive but not really prosper.
It’s obvious we see this much differently. I really hope I’m all wrong on this and would be more than glad if that proved to be the case.