25 POD (cont. 10) (Read 78033 times)
wally
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1987
Location: Minni-soda
Joined: Apr 3rd, 2003
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #50 - Apr 20th, 2009 at 11:13pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
marlin....I've always wonderd about the Tamarak's as well.  Some years they come on in color while there's still alittle deciduous color remaining as well....often they seem to turn yellow just after the deciduous drop...and sometimes they seem to hang on into Nov.

This last fall, I noticed a short season for the Larch color, and most were bare Nov 10th.  Thought it was a pretty poor intensity of color as well.  I love to photograph them.

So what prompts them?....same as the other trees....light, temps, and the years water availability?  It seems to me that dry years seem to produce a shorter color show....but by my (admittedly poor observational skills)...as much more intense color show.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wally
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1987
Location: Minni-soda
Joined: Apr 3rd, 2003
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #51 - Apr 20th, 2009 at 11:14pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Todays pic
reminds me of the Sandpit -- Tin Can Mike...in a dry year.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
starwatcher
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 687
Location: Duluth, MN
Joined: Dec 21st, 2006
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #52 - Apr 21st, 2009 at 12:44am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
wally wrote on Apr 20th, 2009 at 11:14pm:
Todays pic
reminds me of the Sandpit -- Tin Can Mike...in a dry year.


That's it! I noticed Tin Can Mike is named Murphy on my E-15 large scale (c) 1967 Fisher map.  There was a moose swimming across it, Tin Can Mike, when we arrived at the end of the portage.

So, what is it like in a wet year?

starwatcher
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
marlin55388
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1230
Location: Watertown, MN
Joined: Mar 6th, 2009
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #53 - Apr 21st, 2009 at 1:21am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
MMMM-maybe water levels buffer temperature for the Larchs-wet year color is later, dry year color is earlier....not that it makes much difference theyre still wonderbar. Grow them at home-not the same though. Always make a point of hitting the local spots in the fall to take a gander-try to pick the dreariest day i can.....Love them!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Riversend
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 380
Location: out and about
Joined: Oct 18th, 2002
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #54 - Apr 21st, 2009 at 1:29am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
marlin: I transplanted several tamaracks to some wet areas in my yard about 20 years ago, now their about 20' tall and starting to really take off....shure glad I did that, when that golden glow is highlited by autums setting sun rays.....ooooooo..ahhhhh..oh yea..baby, baby//// Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Spartan2
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1607
Location: Horton, Michigan
Joined: Feb 1st, 2005
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #55 - Apr 21st, 2009 at 10:23am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Karl-Starwatcher,

Your autumn photography has been stunning!  Thanks!  I am enjoying every shot.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wally
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1987
Location: Minni-soda
Joined: Apr 3rd, 2003
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #56 - Apr 21st, 2009 at 1:14pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Starwatcher...the "average year" sees most of that end of the portage under water.  Don't have pics...but the reason that "planking" is there is because the water is usally somewhere between ankles and mid leg.....if you manage to stay on the planking.  Problem is...it floats as well.  I've seen more grouse concentrated there (the sandpit end)....in the BWCA, than anywhere else.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
starwatcher
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 687
Location: Duluth, MN
Joined: Dec 21st, 2006
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #57 - Apr 21st, 2009 at 3:27pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Wally, I understand.  I haven't been out this route for a while.

Spartan2 wrote on Apr 21st, 2009 at 10:23am:
Karl-Starwatcher,

Your autumn photography has been stunning!  Thanks!  I am enjoying every shot.


Thanks Lynda, coming from the pro I really feel honored.

starwatcher
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Solus
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 967
Location: Northern Minnesota
Joined: Oct 6th, 2006
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #58 - Apr 21st, 2009 at 4:17pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I think they may have modified the planking. I went through there early last May with exceptionally high water levels and the planking was pretty dry.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlin55388
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1230
Location: Watertown, MN
Joined: Mar 6th, 2009
Re: POD (cont. 10)
Reply #59 - Apr 21st, 2009 at 6:36pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Riversend....oooo....ahhhh......lighting is the bomb isn't it.....try with grasses/willows-pussy and such.  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top