10 BW/Q, Algonquin, and Temagami (Read 11388 times)
Wind-In-Face
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 313
Joined: Apr 8th, 2006
Re: BW/Q, Algonquin, and Temagami
Reply #10 - Jan 17th, 2010 at 8:09pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Welcome ferratagirl.
Weather, air & water temp, black flies and skeeters...all virtually identical. Quetico and Algonquin are about the same latitude. Terrain is similar. Fishing is generally better to much better in Quetico. Bears are more of a problem in Algonquin, IMO, because they've had more opportunities to figure us out.
Take the time to explore this entire website. There is a wealth of info if you're patient, polite, and willing to dig.
WiF
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mk631
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1127
Location: Ohio
Joined: Sep 30th, 2004
Re: BW/Q, Algonquin, and Temagami
Reply #11 - Jan 18th, 2010 at 3:56pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Algonquin is much closer for me, but I go to Quetico anyway for the reasons people have already mentioned.  Fwiw, I've also noticed (on maps) that the portages tend to be longer in Algonquin.
-tom
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ferratagirl
Ex Member


Re: BW/Q, Algonquin, and Temagami
Reply #12 - Jan 18th, 2010 at 10:08pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Thanks for the useful info ! Cheesy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
solotripper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 8103
Location: clarkston MI
Joined: Mar 14th, 2005
Re: BW/Q, Algonquin, and Temagami
Reply #13 - Jan 19th, 2010 at 4:20pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
Algonquin is much closer for me, but I go to Quetico anyway for the reasons people have already mentioned.  Fwiw, I've also noticed (on maps) that the portages tend to be longer in Algonquin.
-tom


Your right about the portages being longer on average. However the 2x I was there, I found them extremely well maintained and especially for a novice, easy too find.

ALL the campsites and portages are marked by a large orange triangle from what I remember. In either case you can't miss them. I always carry a small pair of binoculars. Rather than paddling over, I would scan for unoccupied sites or portage saving time and energy.

The longer portages have plenty of corduroy and the longest I was on, a mile+, had canoe rests about every 1/4 mile. With so much usage, unless you were on a interior remote route, I doubt you'd get off the trail, unless there was a seasonal flooding or blow down.

I agree, for novices or first time solo paddlers who wanted a little "security" blanket, Algonquin isn't the worst choice.
But, after a BW/Q trip, you can't really expect the same experience there IMHO
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top