25 Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National Forest? (Read 32137 times)
kypaddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 308
Location: Kentucky
Joined: Oct 6th, 2007
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National Forest?
Reply #30 - Dec 16th, 2009 at 5:10am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I have long decided that Americans had lost the ability to disagree with dignity and respect, to allow others to hold differing opinions, interpretations and conclusions without resorting to personal attacks, character assassination and ridicule.

Practiced at their worse, partisan politics and religious bickering (or is that partisan bickering and religious politics?) are killing this country.

But discussions like this one give me hope.

I'm impressed with the knowledge, the respect and the clarity of the  arguments demonstrated here thus far -- by those on both sides (jobs v. environment) as well as those who acknowledge some indecision.

Not to lay it on too thick (I prefer my syrup light), but ... very nice, and refreshing, too. Kudos to QJ founders and moderators, as well as veteran members.

...

Having said that, I was interviewing author Rick Bass once about the purpose of wild places, which to him and others is simply to exist, untouched, as a testimony to God's creation or Mother Nature's mystery (or whatever your belief system).

If I remember correctly, there was a proposal floated by President Bush to balance the federal budget by selling some national forest land, including a few parcels of Kentucky's coveted Daniel Boone National Forest. When I talked to him, Bass had recently finished a book about ANWR ("Caribou Rising") and of course he was fighting -- as he is always fighting -- to protect his beloved Yaak Valley in Montana.

... all them, he said, untamed areas where "wild nature still possesses its own compass and grace."

It's tough to be a conservationist these days, he said, to argue the merits of forested areas and pristine waters in a world of hard currency. But the more complicated the world gets, the more important it is.

And then he gave me a quote I've held on to all these years: "With so many critical issues at play in the world, it might seem at times indulgent to be advocating for so elemental and increasingly unfamiliar a value as wildness. But there is hope, for the worse matters get in the larger world, the more we realize, I think, the spiritual value of free and untouched  landscapes, to which -- cribbing from a woman named Ellen Burns Sherman, over a hundred years ago -- we may return again and again, contrite prodigals from the task of an artificial life."

Admittedly, I'm not from Minnesota and do not have intimate knowledge of the area being targeted. Admittedly, too, I have a job and know not the desperation of being unemployed with mouths to feed (I was fortunate as a single father of two children to find a job two years ago when my company closed).

But let's not forget in this discussion that wild places have value -- intangible value, perhaps -- outside the worth of the minerals, timber and crude they hold.

-- kypaddler
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
starwatcher
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 687
Location: Duluth, MN
Joined: Dec 21st, 2006
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National
Reply #31 - Dec 16th, 2009 at 1:33pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
kypaddler wrote on Dec 16th, 2009 at 5:10am:
But let's not forget in this discussion that wild places have value -- intangible value, perhaps -- outside the worth of the minerals, timber and crude they hold.

-- kypaddler


Hear Hear! I agree kypaddler.  We are fortunate to have folks like Sig Olson and others that lead a crusade to preserve the Boundary Waters from development.  I'm sure it was quite a difficult struggle for him particularly living in Ely and having all the mining, forestry and even resort owners with motors and float planes against him.  My hope is that industry, mining and development can live side by side to preserve this wilderness.  I'm convinced there are environmental rules and regulations in place to help maintain the wilderness and still be able to work and live in the area.  Including today the PCA Board passed the Regional Haze rule that is aimed at cleaning the elements of air pollution that cause haze, especially over pristine areas such as Voyageurs National Park, Isle Royale National Park and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness that receive special protections under federal Clean Air Act rules. Both sides Industry and regulators are still arguing. (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

In regards to "allowing others to hold differing opinions" I also agree.  Outside this forum it is frustrating seeing some Political groups using "Hollywood-like" movies to stir up emotions rather than using scientific facts.  One issue on these forums is that people can "read" more into someone's post than what they meant or intended, and then get defensive.  It's human nature and I'm guilty of that.

starwatcher

  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Riversend
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 380
Location: out and about
Joined: Oct 18th, 2002
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National Forest?
Reply #32 - Dec 16th, 2009 at 1:47pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
kypaddler wrote on Dec 16th, 2009 at 5:10am:
I .

If I remember correctly, there was a proposal floated by President Bush to balance the federal budget by selling some national forest land, including a few parcels of Kentucky's coveted Daniel Boone National Forest.

-- kypaddler


kypaddlle: I'm not sure about the proposed sale of USFS lands to balance the budget, but as I recall there was a preposal that the monies from such a sale would go to some sort of rural school funding :question Funding to replace lost source of money generated by timber sales for these shools...no logging = no $ dough $ The USFS is constantly exchanging or desposing (mostly aquireing) lands . Lands selected for these transactions are mostly small or isolated parcels. Some of these parcels are comepletly surounded by private land, so no one but the private land owner has access to these "public" lands. There is a federal program called "summer homes" in which a permit is issued to grant the recipient permission to build vacation type building on Taxpayer land. I think these lands are also selected for disposal, as the permittee is granted sole exclusive rights to occupy these taxpayer lands :question... any way, you might want to some background research into this program for interesting thought prevoking  :exclamation Smiley I'm attaching a photo showing some of this taxpayer timber that was saved from the saw Wink Now, back to the origional  :question
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kypaddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 308
Location: Kentucky
Joined: Oct 6th, 2007
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National Forest?
Reply #33 - Dec 16th, 2009 at 2:58pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Riversend,

You are correct.

I was writing from memory last night and didn't have access to old notes, but you've jogged my memory and I went looking ...

The proposed sale was not to balance the budget per se (i.e. the General Fund or operational fund) but was to raise money for schools and roads to compensate local governments in rural areas for having untaxable federal land within their borders.

Initially, the then-president proposed selling up to 300,000 acres in 32 states to raise up to $800 million to help prop up the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act for five years.

The fund was having problems because of declining timber sales.

In Kentucky, it meant selling 4,518 acres on 47 parcels in the Daniel Boone.

The Forest Service agreed with your characterization of the property: Most of the tracts were small, isolated, difficult and expensive to manage and contained no fragile ecosystems.

But critics feared the sales would set a precedent -- when budgets are tight and revenues are depressed, sell some land -- not unlike what farmers in huge debt were forced to do with corners of their homestead.

As such proposals are wont to do, this one sparked a discussion of a range of issues related to tax policy, federal funding mechanisms, private vs. public ownership, conservation and preservation, endangered species and the purpose and benefit of wilderness areas.

There defines the relevance to this discussion of the proposed mine, I guess.

And now back to Minnesota ....

(I didn't mean to get too far afield, but I wanted to clarify after your note jogged my memory.)

thank you,

-- kypaddler

P.S. And I know nothing about a "summer homes" program, but a piece of trivia: After President Bush floated that proposal, the Forest Service's headquarters in Winchester, Ky., was inundated with phone calls from people wanting to see the tracts "to build a cabin on this property," a spokeswoman said then.

P.S.S. Regarding the "trees" in your picture, are those two yellow populars in that canoe?

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Riversend
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 380
Location: out and about
Joined: Oct 18th, 2002
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National
Reply #34 - Dec 17th, 2009 at 2:05am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
kypaddler wrote on Dec 16th, 2009 at 2:58pm:
Riversend,

You are correct.

There defines the relevance to this discussion of the proposed mine, I guess.

And now back to Minnesota ....

P.S. And I know nothing about a "summer homes" program, but a piece of trivia: After President Bush floated that proposal, the Forest Service's headquarters in Winchester, Ky., was inundated with phone calls from people wanting to see the tracts "to build a cabin on this property," a spokeswoman said then.

P.S.S. Regarding the "trees" in your picture, are those two yellow populars in that canoe?



kypaddler: I was researching a current land exchange deal between Lake County Mn. and the USFS today when I happened upon a bit of info you may be interested in... Under the current Obama admin., Govt. land is still being made available to private ownership  Shocked This federal land is curently under the "summer home" lease program to private owners, more interesting is that the govt. land preposed to be turned into private land is some of the very land that is predicted to become barren waste land if the polymet mine becomes functional  Shocked Shocked  Huh Either the private investers know something about this soon to be "toxic asset" that the rest of us don't know Lips Sealed or the private investors don't put much faith into the  "hollywood" type doom and gloom movie starwatcher made mention of Undecided....hummmmm,hummmmm, and double hummmmmmm :question. I don't know if this link will work, but if you do have intrest, try: (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)    
skle = South Kawishiwi Land Exchange......now I am really wondering :exclamation

ps. don't know about the term yellow populars, herd em refered to by many other terms Grin , but I have spent some time walking amongst scattered clumps of them in the "REDBIRD" down on the Dan'l Boone Wink  
« Last Edit: Dec 17th, 2009 at 6:30am by db »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
db
Web-lackey
Inukshuk
Voyageur
Offline



Posts: 5465
Location: Just off the beaten path.
Joined: Sep 14th, 2002
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National Forest?
Reply #35 - Dec 17th, 2009 at 8:02am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Riversend
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 380
Location: out and about
Joined: Oct 18th, 2002
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National
Reply #36 - Dec 17th, 2009 at 4:50pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
say.......I am starting to have some real concerns about potental damage to an already shaky real estate market ..damage possiably induced to land holders downstrean in the Kawishiwi water shed :question.   If a land invester was shopping for property, I can see how the "hollywood-like" movie implys certain real-estate is bound to have little to no value, and would someone seeking financing for such property find backing or be turned away due the "toxic asset"lable Undecided I am startingt to think the makers of this "holywood-like " film should be held accountable ........class action suit :question....

realy would like some imput  Smiley

thanks for the links db Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Wandering Scott
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 19
Location: Hibbing, MN
Joined: May 18th, 2006
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National
Reply #37 - Dec 17th, 2009 at 10:38pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Thanks again to everyone for information on the subject! I live up here so when I heard of Polymet I said do we really need another grand canyon of the north? do we need more waste rock dumps? We call the dumps up here the coffee grounds and are basically just used for mud running and snowmobiles. And if we do find the need to make more, can we do something with it? I have heard of propositions by civil engineers to make more walkways viewing places, and maybe swimholes, but what real good does that do? Up atop the dumps there is a lot of wind, can that be used for green energy? Can we possibly find some way to make this useful for more than just metal(s)?

I spose ill jus keep wondering... Wink
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
starwatcher
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 687
Location: Duluth, MN
Joined: Dec 21st, 2006
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National
Reply #38 - Dec 17th, 2009 at 11:46pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Hey Wandering Scott, check this out...... (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Maybe they could use your ideas.

Laurention Vision Partnership has been working with mining, government, business and community interests on the Mesabi Iron Range to demonstrate how the mining process can create land forms to accommodate the residents, the environment, and the economy of this region's promising future...Read more.

starwatcher
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
db
Web-lackey
Inukshuk
Voyageur
Offline



Posts: 5465
Location: Just off the beaten path.
Joined: Sep 14th, 2002
Re: Nickel/Copper mining in the Superior National Forest?
Reply #39 - Dec 18th, 2009 at 7:43am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I watched the movie I think you guys are referring to (Yawn, I think) The damning thing on the same site was the sales pitch from the three congressmen who didn't seem to know the boundaries of their own districts. The kicker was some mayor's favorite lake! I'd have been sitting on my hands if I lived there.

Riversend - I like the way you think so I poked around the land swap page. Never been near there so don't know the lay of the land... Is that connected to this or the other two(?) proposed mines and which side of the divide is all this stuff. I'm just curious as I live frustratingly near the Great Lakes Watershed. Someone fill me in please.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top