25 What is the ideal size? (Read 23523 times)
Solus
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 967
Location: Northern Minnesota
Joined: Oct 6th, 2006
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #10 - Feb 26th, 2011 at 8:01pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Tale of La Bonga via Hillman
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jimbo
Moderator
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 4604
Location: Florida
Joined: Oct 6th, 2002
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #11 - Feb 26th, 2011 at 9:31pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Solus wrote on Feb 26th, 2011 at 8:01pm:
Tale of La Bonga via Hillman
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)



Ah, you see but MY guy was La BOMBA... a giant Latino dude who could carry YOUR "La Bonga" on his right shoulder and a 26 foot heavy wooden voyageur canoe on his left shoulder.  As I understand the tale, La Bomba also once harnessed a pollyhumper and "surfed" it & did the tango while crossing big Sturgeon Lake.

Once there, La Bomba met up with Paul Bunyan & Babe the Blue Ox and  smoked a few cigars with them while they swapped yarns.  Babe was partial to Cubans, I'm told.

At least that's how I understand it was....

Jimbo   Cool
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
db
Web-lackey
Inukshuk
Voyageur
Offline



Posts: 5465
Location: Just off the beaten path.
Joined: Sep 14th, 2002
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #12 - Feb 27th, 2011 at 6:15am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I'm thinking long legs, big feet, doesn't photograph, fish or read.... Follow someone over 6'6" for a while and you'll see what I mean.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Kingfisher
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 8th, 2004
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #13 - Feb 28th, 2011 at 2:18am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
db wrote on Feb 27th, 2011 at 6:15am:
I'm thinking long legs, big feet, doesn't photograph, fish or read.... Follow someone over 6'6" for a while and you'll see what I mean.

Early morning I would like to follow some broad shouldered hulk who sweeps all of the dew off of the portage trails. Wink

Seriously, what I was hoping was that we could put together the ideal paddle/ portage thoroughbred given the latest in modern equipment. Yes, I had the "La Bonga" article in mind when I thought of this and there will always be unusual exceptions to every preferred prototype. Back in the day the perfect voyageur was what 5'6" and maybe 180-200 lbs? Rarely though did they travel off trail so carrying prodigious loads was not unbelievable. What amazes me though is the diet they subsisted on during their travels. It seemed woefully inadequate for the amount of work they performed, unlike stories of the 19th century lumberjacks who were extremely well fed by comparison.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Mountain_Paddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 82
Location: Colorado
Joined: Feb 28th, 2011
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #14 - Feb 28th, 2011 at 5:48am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
You guys are getting me nervous.  My sons and I have done a lot of backpacking in the Colorado mountains.  We travel fairly light and still the packs get pretty darn heavy very quickly.  Now we are taking a Quetico week in September, and it seems we have to carry all our normal stuff and add canoes, paddles, and all that also.  How do you guys do it?  And seems to us we'll have to be prepared for more rain than we get in Colorado.  I don't even know if we can carry our packs and a canoe too, because they stick up well above our heads.  If your GPS gets you close, can you find the portage easily?  Is the route marked?  One that bothers me is Maligne River to Poohbah Lake--I don't find a lot of details about it.  Am I going to spend all my time figuring out where the portage is and all the while carrying more than a 70-year-old can do?  Fortunately, my sons are in their 40s and strong.  What's the deal?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #15 - Feb 28th, 2011 at 12:12pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Relax Mountain paddler, you'll do fine.

I started out as a backpacker in the high country too. I find the canoe camping easier (at least so far) Wink.

Most of the portages in the Q are fairly well trod although you may mistake a moose trail for one occasionally. If in doubt walk it for a little ways to see if it peters out before unloading.

I know you have GPS but I prefer not to head straight at a portage but bear off to one side and then follow the shore until I see the put in. Often, but not always, a portage will be the low spot on the horizon.

Sometimes portages are much less obvious. For example if there is a smooth rock facing that angles up substantially there will be no visible sign of the portage from your vantage point in the canoe. Look up toward the tree line as you paddle the bank in these instances. Often there will be an old blaze or even an old chain saw cut where trail work was done as a clue.

One thing to keep in mind however, are some of the trails may be a bit rougher than your typical hiking trail. Rock gardens are fairly common but usually short lived. Boggy spots are a bit more common than on a typical hiking trail as well. Fortunately these problem areas are usually on flat ground which helps.

You will likely have a fine time. Beautiful area with good fishing. Take your time on the portages and double or even triple portage (especially in the beginning when you are fresh and the packs are heaviest). Take your time and soak it all in. If you and your party develop a hurry-hurry attitude you will likely be cheating yourself. Slow down and take a breath and look and listen. The miles will add up and you will still cover plenty of ground, trust me.  
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Mountain_Paddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 82
Location: Colorado
Joined: Feb 28th, 2011
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #16 - Feb 28th, 2011 at 12:38pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Thanks for the reassurance, MasterTangler.  We're going into Q at Beaverhouse and coming and getting picked up where Maligne River enters into Lac La Croix.  For no reason except my nickname is Wink, we are thinking of going to Wink Lake if the first part of the trip goes real smoothly.  We were told to do that by going Maligne River to Poohbah Lake and then Poohbah Lake to Wink Lake and then same route in return.  We were told to stay away from the boggy junk that is between Wink Lake and Maligne River.  Anyhow, most everything is very well trod and it doesn't bother me.  But one of the posts about Maligne River to Poohbah Lake said they looked forever for it and finally gave up.  And so I was imagining doing that at 70 years old, walking in heavy-duty mud, carrying more than by back will handle, and still not knowing where I am going.  You are very reassuring; thanks.  Is this double portaging thing the norm?  We wouldn't even dream of such a duplication of effort in our previous mountain experience.  What do most folks do who are up in years?  Is the double portage thing the norm?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #17 - Feb 28th, 2011 at 1:16pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
There are lots of very experienced folk here at QJ. I have not trod the portage in question but if you keep checking back someone else has and will very likely lend a helping hand. Good folk in these parts when it comes to helping out.

In my world double portaging is very much the norm. There is no duplication of effort as you are not carrying the same items across twice Wink. Triple portaging is not out of the question for some folk either especially if your goal is base camping and you want lots of "goodies". The portages on average are fairly short compared to hiking in the mountains hour after hour. If you insist on carrying heavy loads so you don't have to double so be it.

My suggestion would be to plan on doubling especially your first time in. Then evaluate your gear selection for future trips and having had a better feel for the lay of the land you can better understand what needs to happen to single safely and effectively. The flip side is if you plan on singling and have very heavy loads the fun factor may decrease and you might set yourself up for a fall and get hurt. And for what? So you could save 15 minutes? Besides, the walk back unencumbered through the woods after being mostly on the water is very nice. You get to feel and see and hear the wind in the trees (and the skeets buzzing in your face Grin). This is also a good time to take pics.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Mountain_Paddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 82
Location: Colorado
Joined: Feb 28th, 2011
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #18 - Feb 28th, 2011 at 1:25pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Thanks.  Wow.  You must have a bit of the philosopher in you.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DentonDoc
Moderator
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Dec 27th, 2003
Re: What is the ideal size?
Reply #19 - Feb 28th, 2011 at 3:56pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
M_P -

My background ... a committed backpacker until I reached 60.  Now, I'm transitioning into more canoe travel.  (For these old bones, it is nice to spend most of my day without a pack on my back and enjoying the scenery going by.)

Generally speaking, you're going to find the conditions of portage trails to be poor compared to most hiking trails in the Rockies.  Won't be facing anything like the vertical climb to reach Sky Pond in RMNP, but I've sometimes come upon a point in the trail where my initial impression is "yeah, RIGHT!" based on a step or two I'll need to make to get over a vertical rise/fall.  More often than not the elevation change is very minor, the issue is more that the rock face is granite and if its wet, you'll have little traction. 

So, as previously mentioned, the issue really isn't the load you can carry but what you can carry safely.  While I can carry 120 lbs, I feel I can safely carry about 70 (I'll usually limit to about 60 on hikes in the Rockies).  So with that number in mind, I break up my load in such a way as not to exceed that number.  For me, that translates into double portages ... food tends to be a relatively hefty mass since all of my trips are over 10 days.  For individuals this hiking experience, you'll find that walking with a canoe overhead will feel unwieldy ... but you will get use to it.  It does make negotiating deadfall "interesting" at times.

Good new for the trip is that you don't have to suck wind because of the altitude.  The bad news is that you'll sometimes find yourself wind bound.  Also, you might want to think about what you'll do when you can't get a tent stake in the ground (it happens ... some campsites are on rock slabs which might have only an inch or two of actual dirt covering it, if that).

As far as finding portages, a couple of other things that might tip you to a location ... bent grass along the edge of the forest, an uncharacteristic gap in the trees at ground level, exposed roots that show a bit of scuff, rocks with unnatural markings, unusual colors on slightly submerged rocks (gel coat residue).  But, my experience is that if you are patient and do a little searching, the portage will "show up."

dd
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top