18.6 vs 17.4 (Read 2225 times)
Puckster
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1208
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Joined: Feb 10th, 2009
18.6 vs 17.4
Mar 25th, 2011 at 5:59pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I just bought a Bell Northwoods, 18'6".   Until now, I've always paddled 17'  canoes. 

Are longer canoes inherently more stable?

prouboy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kerry
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 427
Location: Toronto
Joined: May 13th, 2010
Re: 18.6 vs 17.4
Reply #1 - Mar 25th, 2011 at 7:26pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
All the canoes in the Bell Northstar-Northwind-Northwoods line have tremendous secondary stability (stability when the canoe is in motion) so, comparing apples to apples, that is the Northstar (16-6) to the Northwoods (18-6), I don't think you'd find much difference in stability.  The bigger canoe will undoubtedly be a hair slower due to the load you'll be carrying (although the hull speed is actually higher) but, given its added length, should track a little better.
Congratulations on your new canoe.  If you haven't paddled a Bell before, you're going to love it.  Hang on to it, those Bells are getting rarer as we speak!
« Last Edit: Mar 25th, 2011 at 9:02pm by Kerry »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Solus
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 967
Location: Northern Minnesota
Joined: Oct 6th, 2006
Re: 18.6 vs 17.4
Reply #2 - Mar 26th, 2011 at 1:01am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
If you have two hulls of similar design/shape the longer hull will generally  be faster and track straighter. The Northwoods is a sweet tripping hull - moves well, can carry a load and handle difficult conditions. Nice find!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Puckster
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1208
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Joined: Feb 10th, 2009
Re: 18.6 vs 17.4
Reply #3 - Mar 27th, 2011 at 2:52am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Thanks Solus.  Years ago I sold a Northwind black gold as it weighed 59 pounds. But I've missed the Bell. Now I'm back in the fold!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top