25 Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19) (Read 35412 times)
DentonDoc
Moderator
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Dec 27th, 2003
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #40 - May 3rd, 2011 at 12:53am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
solotripper wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 4:21pm:
IF there's a more majestic man-made " Cathedral", I'd like to see it Cool

Cathedrals, although grand, don't quite do it.  The only man made object I'd put in a class just below the picture would be Bernini's sculpture of (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Borghese Museum, Rome).  Near perfection in stone.  So close to reality, you expect to see them move, if only you waited long enough.

dd
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kypaddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 308
Location: Kentucky
Joined: Oct 6th, 2007
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #41 - May 3rd, 2011 at 12:49pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Love the sea gull shot. ...

As far as women in Quetico, I'd love to spend two weeks in the remote wild with my wife, chasing her around an island. Unfortunately, her tolerance for discomfort (cold, wet, weariness, bugs, hard ground, campfire smoke) is rather low (OK, non-existent) so a trip together will NEVER happen.

But I can't wait to take my niece up there. She'd fit right in (does mini triathalons(sp?), skates under "Natural Disaster" nickname on Roller Derby team, hunts deer ...)

We don't discriminate: In fact, some of our most memorable deer-hunting photographs over the years feature my niece (with big buck, surrounded by uncles, brother and Dad) and my sister the teacher (with blonde braids, dead deer and a .35 Remington), and my daughter (then 4) helping to skin.

But my question about canoe placement is this: Adhering to the theory of power in front and steady control in back, doesn't the weight differential typically pose a challenge? I'm 205, my wife is 135. Hypothetically speaking, if she did like to canoe and had skills with a Bending Branch, how could we possibly put her in the back?

Is this a problem for anyone else?

-- kypaddler
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Preacher
Contributer
Subscriber
Offline



Posts: 1327
Location: COTU
Joined: Apr 10th, 2010
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #42 - May 3rd, 2011 at 1:39pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Not about to get into the subjective comparison of random nature vs. human design & accomplishment except to refer to Kris Kristofferson, "Everything is beautiful in its own way."  That's 'refer' Kris, not 'reefer'.

Great shot today.  When I was young we used to skip stones and much discussion was had regarding stone selection & technique.  Do you look for seagulls with flatter bottoms?  Is it more of a wrist flick or full arm/body action?   

Cheesy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JChief
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 196
Location: Ohio
Joined: Mar 29th, 2009
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #43 - May 3rd, 2011 at 8:18pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
kypaddler wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:49pm:
As far as women in Quetico, I'd love to spend two weeks in the remote wild with my wife, chasing her around an island. Unfortunately, her tolerance for discomfort (cold, wet, weariness, bugs, hard ground, campfire smoke) is rather low (OK, non-existent) so a trip together will NEVER happen.



KYP - I think we married the same woman.  Wink

I would love to have her along but since I took my her on a trip to Quebec not long after we married; cabins, powerboats, electricity, hot showers... and she vowed never to go back. A trip to the Q is out of the question. Since I only get up there every other year, a trip she fully supports, we spend the off year doing what she wants to do. A compromise I am happy to make.

To keep this post on point, I have really enjoyed the last few days of pics!

J
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Preacher
Contributer
Subscriber
Offline



Posts: 1327
Location: COTU
Joined: Apr 10th, 2010
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #44 - May 3rd, 2011 at 8:31pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
JChief wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 8:18pm:
kypaddler wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:49pm:
As far as women in Quetico, I'd love to spend two weeks in the remote wild with my wife, chasing her around an island. Unfortunately, her tolerance for discomfort (cold, wet, weariness, bugs, hard ground, campfire smoke) is rather low (OK, non-existent) so a trip together will NEVER happen.



KYP - I think we married the same woman.  Wink

OMG!

She's three-timing us!  Clearly too busy to go on any vacation.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kingfisher
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 8th, 2004
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #45 - May 3rd, 2011 at 9:19pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
kypaddler wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:49pm:
But my question about canoe placement is this: Adhering to the theory of power in front and steady control in back, doesn't the weight differential typically pose a challenge? I'm 205, my wife is 135. Hypothetically speaking, if she did like to canoe and had skills with a Bending Branch, how could we possibly put her in the back?

Is this a problem for anyone else?

-- kypaddler


Yes it can be a problem but typically a canoe trip includes a few packs that can be loaded stern heavy. Obviously it's a big advantage to have less of a weight difference. My wife and I used to have an 85 lb weight difference and it became a problem. I decided to do something about it and we now have a 35 lb weight difference and I got stronger too. No I didn't fatten her up.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
ToothFairy
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 158
Location: Grand Rapids, MN
Joined: Feb 1st, 2006
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #46 - May 4th, 2011 at 1:48am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I like this talk about women in the Quetico.  Sorry your wives didn't like it, sounds like you all have worked it out though.  Glad you are inviting/including nieces and daughters.  Just wanted to keep you on your toes......See you in the Q or the BW.   Kim
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlin55388
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1230
Location: Watertown, MN
Joined: Mar 6th, 2009
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #47 - May 4th, 2011 at 2:56am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Well there is a 100# difference between my son and I now; and we have done just fine and I am pretty sure that has nothing to with gender or a weight differential.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mk631
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1127
Location: Ohio
Joined: Sep 30th, 2004
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #48 - May 5th, 2011 at 2:51am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
So is there a story that goes with the bushwack towards Malone??
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SaltedLeech
Jr. Member
Offline



Posts: 54
Location: Michigan
Joined: Jan 19th, 2011
Re: Picture of the day - POD (cont. 19)
Reply #49 - May 6th, 2011 at 5:46pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
No real story on the Bushwhack... Found the Freshwater sponges and was hoping that the lake had some decent fishing, nope just hammer handles.

Found Sun Dews, Picture plants and heard wolves on on the same day  so it was really a great day Wink

I also found that when crossing the high grass bogs it was easier to drag the canoe with a lead rope than carry it...the hull glides over the grass and makes stepping in the unseen holes much easier with out the weight on your back.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top