10 MT's tip of the month / Nov 2011 (Read 5163 times)
jaximus
Senior Member
Offline



Posts: 343
Location: wisconsin
Joined: May 12th, 2010
Re: MT's tip of the month / Nov 2011
Reply #10 - Nov 11th, 2011 at 12:47am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
good discussion. i agree trolling covers more water. no denying that. however, fish school and congregate on food supplies and structure, so once i find those by trolling, i zone in with casting. i dont cast for trout because they move around too much and trolling is more effective. walleyes hug structure (or follow baitfish schools) so they are more easily caught casting. i feel like i can catch negative fish casting around them when they dont want to bite, whereas trolling picks up active fish but leaves the negative fish untouched.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: MT's tip of the month / Nov 2011
Reply #11 - Nov 11th, 2011 at 3:21am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Man, I know I can be a pain the rear at times..........but in the best spirit of furthering the discussion Wink

I am with you on trolling picking up active fish......no question about it.

I'm also with you on casting is probably the very best way to work a particular piece of structure (although I can follow a break line pretty dang well while trolling).

And I'm also with you on being able to "tease" neutral or even negative fish into nibbling by casting and retrieving.....lots more control.

But......(you knew that was coming didn't you) I also think I can get neutral and even negative fish to strike a trolled lure. It is called a reaction strike and I know Mr. Jax is very familiar with the concept. Whats nice about a trolled lure is that I can keep it in the strike zone for extended periods. Sooner or later while bumpin bottom a walleye is going to have to decide to get out of the way or smack the crap out of this obnoxious cisco that is so stupid as to disturb its repose.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
jaximus
Senior Member
Offline



Posts: 343
Location: wisconsin
Joined: May 12th, 2010
Re: MT's tip of the month / Nov 2011
Reply #12 - Nov 11th, 2011 at 4:58am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
for the neutral/negative fish that reaction strike i feel obnoxious colors with loud rattles are the way to go. firetiger especially. its not really an 'i want to eat you bite' but rather a 'what is that and why is it here' reaction. its like a dog that mouths things. thats how the test stuff out. but the rest i agree with. i dont think you get a reaction strike from a negative fish using a natural pattern without some obnoxious rattles.

with that said, ive sorta started to fall in love with minnow raps. very cisco shaped and the natural shad pattern has my mouth watering.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: MT's tip of the month / Nov 2011
Reply #13 - Nov 11th, 2011 at 12:19pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Please be patient with me as I again present "what ifs" that seem on the face of it to be just purely for the sake of being disagreeable......that is not my intent.

I seldom if ever use loud colors/loud rattles in clear water even if I seek a reaction strike. On negative fish I prefer, and this is only my opinion, subtler colors and sounds. What I want is for that fish to not even know that lure is there until it is almost on top of it. It has but a second or two to make a decision. Loud colors/loud rattles let a fish "think" about it for to long IMO.

Of course the fascinating thing about fishing is there are days where either approach is the ticket to the exclusion of the other. Likely best to try both........I would be out of luck as I carry no loud colors at all to canoe country and I would just have to sit there as Jax says "Oh, I got another one" Grin.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Old Salt
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 4871
Location: Crossville, TN
Joined: Jun 17th, 2004
Re: MT's tip of the month / Nov 2011
Reply #14 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 3:57pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
What's really fun about fishing is that it can be so unpredictable. (Perhaps this is my tip of 'next month'). While following various patterns produces fish, there are always exceptions to the rule (loud patterns in clear water being one of them). I have also caught fish in places they shouldn't be. Yes, I follow the general 'rules' about finding and catching fish, but on a good day, I like to experiment with different methods and lures, to see what else is working... Cool
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
moonman
Jr. Member
Offline



Posts: 59
Location: Toronto, Canada
Joined: Sep 15th, 2010
Re: MT's tip of the month / Nov 2011
Reply #15 - Dec 2nd, 2011 at 3:27pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I agree with MT on this one. Yes on both counts, sometimes rattles good, sometimes not so good. The thing is, as fishermen, we do what has worked for us in the past. If you use rattles a lot, you will catch fish and say, its the rattles....why change, it works. This is of course true. Conversely, guys who don't like rattles are still catching fish, so they say, no, its better without rattles. The key is that you gotta try different things and constantly assess. The lure is really like a scanning or probing device. It gives you lots of info. One thing I often do, is that if a lure I'm using is just killing them, I remove it and try something else. For me its, hmm, wonder if this other lure will work as well? That's the fun part. Especially something new or even something very old...I'm sure a lot of you guys do the same thing. One thing I will say, again agreeing with MT and others, is that for the biggest fish around, I think no rattles will work better. This is said from experience. Rattles will pick off smaller fish, aggressive fish. Not to say big fish won't hit them, as I've caught lots of really nice fish using rattles, I'm talking about the biggest fish around. You can see this sometimes with smallies if you are fishing clear water from an elevated position, say a high shoreline bank. You cast of a floating rap say. Smaller fish will hit it almost any way you work the lure. The bigger fish sit underneath watching. Often times you can see that big fish and if you are more aggressive with the lure, it will sink out of site or even turn and swim directly away...I've found one of the best approaches in this situation is to cast out maybe near where you think the big guy is heading, but over a bit deeper water. Just let the lure sit. Thats it. Keep a tight line. Doesn't work all the time, but more often than not, whamo! The same approach can sometimes work even better with a jig. The rap will keep catching fish mind you, even some fairly big ones, but for that huge bruiser you can just barely see, cast a jig (bucktail or marabou in natural colours work best in this situation), and just let it sit on the bottom - again, keeping a fairly tight line is important. Works even better if you tip it with a small piece of worm. That big fish knows your jig is there, guaranteed. He'll just watch it, sometimes coming over and tilting down on it. Closer, closer....if you aggressively move you jig, especially after only a few seconds, nada. The fish is gone. Just let it sit. If you can stand it, this approach is deadly. After more than a minute or two, maybe just roll the jig an inch or two with a slow pull, never hopping it. Whamo!

Of course, this is just my experience. Lots of ways to catch fish. But this approach definitely works for the big ones.

Moonman.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top