Poll
Poll Question: Do you generally cook on a fire or on a stove?



« Created by: Snow_Dog on: May 8th, 2012 at 12:41pm »

 10 Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking (Read 11730 times)
Snow_Dog
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1858
Location: Twin Cities
Joined: Jul 11th, 2003
Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
May 8th, 2012 at 12:41pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Been awhile since this topic was addressed. 

What do you prefer to cook over: a fire or a stove?  Assume there is no fire ban in effect, of course.  Feel free to comment below and make your case for why your preferred method/system is the best.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Snow_Dog
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1858
Location: Twin Cities
Joined: Jul 11th, 2003
Re: Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
Reply #1 - May 8th, 2012 at 12:49pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I used to cook over a fire 100% of the time.  Never could understand why anyone would want to pack in heavy stoves and fuel when cooking over a fire is free and saves a lot of weight in the pack.

Then I finally had to make a trip under a fire ban.  Brought along an old "green suitcase", the trusty Coleman two-burner stove.  My eyes were opened by the experience.  Yes, it was more weight and bulk in the packs but I found that cooking was much quicker and easier, plus the cleanup time was greatly reduced.  After that trip, I resoved to stay with stove cooking.  I did quickly realize that two single-burners were much lighter to pack and provided much better heat control than the old suitcase so that's what I use now (and sometimes even a 3rd for larger groups).

I still use a fire for foil-baked trout or the rare trips where I am base-camping and I bring a reflector oven, but that's about it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
monjon
Senior Member
Offline



Posts: 342
Joined: Jan 29th, 2004
Re: Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
Reply #2 - May 8th, 2012 at 1:09pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I've been using a Century propane 2 burner stove for some time .  The stove weights 8 lbs and for a 5 day trip we bring 4 cylinders which get divided between our packs.  So much easier to cook due to better heat control and no black pots at the end of the trip.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
solotripper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 8109
Location: clarkston MI
Joined: Mar 14th, 2005
Re: Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
Reply #3 - May 8th, 2012 at 1:13pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
About 90% stove, but there are somethings that IMHO need a fire to bring out the full flavor.
Baked/Grilled Laker would be one of them, and of course reflector oven baked goods.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Spartan2
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1607
Location: Horton, Michigan
Joined: Feb 1st, 2005
Re: Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
Reply #4 - May 8th, 2012 at 1:19pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
We used to cook on the fire all of the time, but we used to break camp and move every day, paddle a lot farther, portage a lot longer, and do everything a lot more energetically than we do now.   Wink

There are only two of us.  One small stove is fine for our simple meals, and it is a great convenience.  If clean firewood is readily available (read that:  no pine), we will cook on the fire.  And if we feel like bothering.  But now, if we don't feel like bothering, we use the stove.  In the morning I like to get up really early and have a quick cup of coffee even before the fire is getting going anyway.

We will often build a pine fire, even with just twigs and the little stuff that accumulates around the campsite, for our morning warm-up fire, or our evening campfire to sit around and enjoy.  Toast a few marshmallows. 

I think we probably are in the 50-50 group, but more and more we are tending to do our cooking on the stove and save the fire for atmosphere.

I don't remember the big suitcase Coleman stove fondly.  Can't tell you what our little tiny stove now is called, but it is small and lightweight, you don't have to use a match to light it, and I like it a lot.  When I bake on it I use a diffuser and my small Jello-mold oven, and create some tasty treats.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wally
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1987
Location: Minni-soda
Joined: Apr 3rd, 2003
Re: Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
Reply #5 - May 8th, 2012 at 1:58pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Fire....if you are getting wood and washing.

Stove....if it is me solo
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jjcanoeguide
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 309
Location: Frisco, TX
Joined: Jun 20th, 2007
Re: Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
Reply #6 - May 8th, 2012 at 4:12pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Defnitely use both.  I have found that for us, typically a larger size group of 6+ people on a 8-10 day trip, fire cooking is usually preferable for the cooked meals, as the fuel required for the large one-pot meals begins to be absurd.  In one fire-ban trip with 9 people for 10 days, we burned through 2 gallons using 2 MSR Dragonfly stoves, which are pretty efficient for the task.  Much of the fuel was used on the fish fry meals and baking, but it just takes a long time to boil water for that many people (just for meals and hot drinks, not for purifying drinking water).  Plus, you have the helping hands so firewood collection, fire building/maintaining, cooking and cleaning can all be separate tasks.  However, I still prefer to bake on a stove.

For smaller crews, the convenience of a stove often wins, especially if a fire is not desired.

I'm hoping that everyone knows to apply soap to the outside of pots prior to cooking over a fire.  Do it once at the start of a trip and it forms a good black coating.  At the end of the trip, you can wash off pretty easily.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
chaga
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 339
Location: S/W Pennsylvania
Joined: Sep 9th, 2003
Re: Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
Reply #7 - May 8th, 2012 at 4:14pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I can cook on a stove at home. I go camping to cook on a fire.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
ripple
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 52
Location: marengo, iowa
Joined: Jun 3rd, 2009
Re: Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
Reply #8 - May 8th, 2012 at 5:10pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Mix. More stove/ simpler meals when solo.  More fire cooking with canoe buddy (who loves to cook and usually takes on most of it): light aluminum dutch-oven for biscuits and cornbread; light clamping grill for fish.  Have yet to find the fuel stove with good flame adjustment.  I use mainly white gas and an MSR, right now, and it seems to have two adjustments: hell for leather, or off.  Have had it apart and cleaned, but can't find any other adjustment.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Preacher
Contributer
Subscriber
Offline



Posts: 1327
Location: COTU
Joined: Apr 10th, 2010
Re: Campfires vs. Stoves for cooking
Reply #9 - May 8th, 2012 at 5:17pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Stove +90% of the time.  It's easy and quick.  I can be eating faster than I can have fire ready for cooking on.

If I have a fire going I do like to keep a pot on for tea or even just dring hot water on a cold day.

Sometimes I bring food for the fire.  Weiners or wings or ribs.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top