25 Lesson #4 cover up (Read 26692 times)
Phoenix
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 181
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Joined: Aug 13th, 2009
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #30 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 2:05am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Wow!. I've been a paying member (voluntarily, I might add) for only about 3 years now. The main reasons I joined QJ are:

(1) the information posted here is generally very useful and deals in detail I can find nowhere else with one of the few areas in North America I truly love - namely, Quetico.

(2) compared to other boards I have visited or participated on, QJ appears to be well moderated and VERY civilized. I've have had personal PMs with a number of the members and found them to be very generous and helpful and pleasant to converse with.

Yes, QJ is very Quetico (or further north) centric - as Linda says - but that is exactly what I'm looking for. I would have no problem with more posts dealing with the Boundary Waters, by the way.

For what it's worth, that's my perspective.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Westwood
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 669
Location: Was Minnesota Now Iowa
Joined: Mar 4th, 2005
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #31 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 4:44am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I don't know anything about QJ's reputation.  But I do agree that the discussion on the political /religion areas were embarrassing and damaging to QJ.  I even thought of quitting the site because of the outrageous comments made on the site.  I still have trouble listening to certain people when they talk about fishing and camping because of the outrageous comments they made previously.

It certainly is true that QJ focuses on Quetico, but that is a big plus to me.  I haven't been to the BWCA for over 25 years and have no immediate plans on visiting the BWCA.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jimmar
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 860
Location: SE Michigan
Joined: Feb 1st, 2006
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #32 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 10:14am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
My thoughts.
1. Checking QJ is part of my daily morning routine, have to have it.
2. Yes it it seems to have more content related to Quetico. I like.
3. I don't feel like I'm part of the clique, that's ok by me.
4. I didn't even read any of the political/religious postings - I avoid that BS when ever I can - it probably would have made this place less enjoyable if I'd read them.
5. The banter I read when a couple of folks get their shorts in a bundle is sometimes enjoyable. Personalities come through in the posts, I like reading MT and PJ as well as other QJ celebs. Just seeing their name on a post sparks my attention.
6. I have noticed traffic seems to have slowed considerably in the past year or so, that I don't like.
7. I try to make a contribution, although on the light side, to this forum (pics, trip reports, comments, $), but never felt pressure to do so.
8. I've been attacked on another forum so ferociously for what I thought was an innocent that a moderator shut down the thread in just a few hours. That has never happened (to me) here.
9. the QJ reputation is good with me.


  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
TomT
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1052
Location: Chicago Burbs
Joined: Aug 26th, 2007
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #33 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 11:48am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I brought up the word "reputation" so I want to add that I frequent another board and like Lynda echo what she has heard about QJ. 

Maybe I was quick to come down on PJ (hey, I'm relatively new here and really don't know who he is) but I just saw it as so unecessary to what was an innocent thread topic by MT, who I really don't know also.

I realize these forums can be very hard to manage with all the different personalities but maybe people can be a little more tolerant of others positions here. That includes religion and politics. 

this seems like a good group of very experienced trippers and I enjoy the Q heavy aspect as I lean that way now myself.  And - it's much smaller membership than the other board is very appealing to me also. This board doesn't stray too much from the canoe camping topic which I appreciate.

Carry on.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PhantomJug
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 2855
Location: 1/2 way there
Joined: Feb 12th, 2003
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #34 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 12:05pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I guess I should have been paying attention.  Should have known that if a discussion on ticks and poison ivy goes 4 pages, something else is going on.  Geesh, not even the courtesy of it's (my?) own thread.

I call a thing what it is.  I'm gonna go fill my bird-feeders.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Mad_Mat
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1548
Joined: Apr 21st, 2003
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #35 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 12:26pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
me, I've always preferred Quality over Quantity - noise for the sake of noise isn't a "Quiet Journey"

this has always been a "quality" site in comparison to the many other forums I've looked at whether canoeing or backpacking or climbing oriented

but I don't mind poking fun at people either, for that matter.  sometimes, lately, I've found myself reluctant to add to a post if I don't really have anything constructive or destructive to add
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
solotripper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 8103
Location: clarkston MI
Joined: Mar 14th, 2005
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #36 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 1:26pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I look at this site as a valuable resource that if you want to get something from, you should try to give something back.

I don't go to bars/coffee shops to discuss issues that don't pertain to paddling/camping etc, so I like the BTC forum and think now that it's opt in only, people especially visitors shouldn't be offended unless they choose to get into that mix.

IF any partisan/personal rancor comes out of the BTC and intrudes on the other forums, it's the Moderators job to stop it anyway they see fit.

I'm sure I've offended some, maybe many, but 99% of that wasn't intentional, the other 1%, I plead guilty as charged.
I pride myself on being the same in person as I appear to be here.  I also know that isn't necessary a plus in a PC world. Anyone who understands that not everyone is going to like/approve of them shouldn't have to PC think every post/comment because others are offended unless it's so egregious and then it's the Moderators job to police those problems.

I think the Moderators do/have done a remarkable job trying to balance someone's free speech rights without offending others, a near impossible task especially on-line.

I've been taken to task by the Moderators and respected their concerns even if I didn't agree with them.

Cliques, well every site has them. QJ seems to have more than a few people, myself included who don't feel the need to be in a "clique" but are not offended/ intimidated by people in a certain "circle".

I understand how some new to site feel they're treated harshly when they post a question, but IMHO that's a 2-way street. When I first became aware of QJ, I "lurked" for awhile to get the "lay of the land".
I took the time to check out ALL the links. I don't think it's being rude/harsh for someone to chastise a guest/newbie who asks for specific info that is readily available IF you do your homework instead of asking/expecting others to plan your route/tell you the best fishing holes etc.
I'm of the opinion that you should make a "deposit" no matter how small in the QJ "bank" before you ask for a large "withdrawal".

As a whole I think this site is a good or better than most. People here are very generous once you establish some familiarity with them and I've gotten and sent numerous PM's that prove that point.

I do think the emphasis is more on the Q, but there is more and more emphasis on other paddling destinations for those who want to expand their boundaries.
Maybe we need to look at someway to separate the BWCA/Q specific info in the General Discussions forum?
That might make BWCA people feel more welcome and consolidate that info.

All in all this is a great site/family, but like any social group, someone is bound to be mad/upset with someone/something.

Hell, if I quit every time I got pissed at someone at work, I'd be walking the unemployment line.
I liken this site to cable TV. Lot's of "channels" some maybe offensive, but you don't drop your subscription, you just don't turn to that channel.










  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kypaddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 308
Location: Kentucky
Joined: Oct 6th, 2007
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #37 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 1:55pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
earned by the vagaries & vicissitudes of our QJ membership


hey Jimbo.

As a writer, I'm geeking out right now.

Nice.

- kypaddler
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PhantomJug
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 2855
Location: 1/2 way there
Joined: Feb 12th, 2003
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #38 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 2:01pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
kypaddler wrote on Oct 22nd, 2013 at 1:55pm:
Quote:
earned by the vagaries & vicissitudes of our QJ membership


hey Jimbo.

As a writer, I'm geeking out right now.

Nice.

- kypaddler


(I had to look up 'halcyon days')
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Spartan2
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1605
Location: Horton, Michigan
Joined: Feb 1st, 2005
Re: Lesson #4 cover up
Reply #39 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 3:12pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
ST:  I don't think having a separate designation for BWCA would work now.  This forum has turned its back on the BW for so long that another forum has taken its place and that is probably OK.  The last time I remember a specifically BW post here, I answered and I believe one other person did.  It soon fell to the bottom of the page, and off the page, and I don't think that person has posted since.

It isn't a criticism, it's just a fact.  If you want to talk about the BWCA, this is no longer the place to come.  And the respondents to my earlier comments have already made that clear just since my original post. 

When I came here at first, I was pointed to this site by a photographer friend from Chelsea, Michigan.  He had seen my BWCA photography, and he suggested that I might enjoy Quiet Journey.  I dipped my feet gingerly into the water, and back then (probably about 2004 or 2005?) it was more balanced between the BWCA/Quetico.  Because we had been to both, we could comment with everyone and we felt like we fit in.  Now that we only go to the BW, and now that we don't travel on the same kind of adventures that we did when we were younger, we don't have much to contribute.

But this was my first canoeing website and I love it here.  I check in every single morning, first with the POD, and then with the general forum.  Occasionally I post, although rarely now.  I miss some of the people who used to come here regularly, and I am glad to see some of the friends we have met through the years who are still here.

If I gave the impression that I am upset with anything, I am not.  It is what it is.  db asked what the "reputation" of QJ is, and since I am now more active in other communities, and since I get feedback from people who know I am a loyal QJ member as well, I thought I would give my perspective. 

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top