10 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan (Read 2657 times)
Mk631
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1127
Location: Ohio
Joined: Sep 30th, 2004
2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Oct 9th, 2013 at 3:09am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Hey, so db started this thread about the new Quetico Preliminary Management Plan: (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

If you go to the link he's got there, look for:
2013
Preliminary Management Plan - PDF

I browsed over the whole thing & it looks like it's pretty low-impact to any of us using the park:
- camping remains the same (mostly)*
- fishing remains the same (still no live bait, barbless)

* There seems to be one exception, in that a "Nature Reserve" zone will disallow camping in this area:
(am I right about that?) -- see p 24
Provincially rare basic cliff communities are found along the following lakes: Blackstone (1), Other Man (3), Ottertrack (10), This Man (3), Littlerock (2), Emerald (12), Fisher (1), Sheridan (1) and on a tributary of the Wawiag River. The Basic Open Cliff Type is provincially rare and ranked S3S4 (Bakowsky 2002). This zone is delineated as all of the cliff faces on the listed lakes.
...
Rock climbing and scrambling, back country camping, and mechanized travel are not permitted in nature reserve ones. Existing campsites in nature reserve zones will be closed and rehabilitated. Commercial trapping in NR zones by Lac La Croix trappers is permitted.

I'd like to see if others (perhaps more familiar with pervious versions of this plan than I) see the same things...

-Tom
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Magicpaddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1321
Location: Chicago Burbs
Joined: Jan 7th, 2004
Re: 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Reply #1 - Oct 14th, 2013 at 9:36pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
East side entry.  I have walked the portage in it is about 1 mile.
Toilets on some sights.
Are the cliff communities human or plant?
 McKenzie Lake fire tower removal
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
db
Web-lackey
Inukshuk
Voyageur
Offline



Posts: 5460
Location: Just off the beaten path.
Joined: Sep 14th, 2002
Re: 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Reply #2 - Oct 18th, 2013 at 4:49am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
With over a month left to care, I was hoping more folks would highlight any concerns they may have so I could read it with different points of skew than my own in mind.

By notifying me of this public comment period window of opportunity - they were asking for YOUR input - as am I.

Anyone else?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Jim J Solo
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1195
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Joined: Apr 6th, 2007
Re: 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Reply #3 - Oct 18th, 2013 at 1:58pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I wouldn't want the east side of Q any easier to access than it already is. I think it's nice to have a section that's difficult to get to.

I briefly read some of the doc, but would like to add to my post.

pg 15 shows how many people enter and where. Seems very few people go to the trouble of entering from the Cdn side. So more people entering the east side wouldn't seem to be much of a problem as far as solitude.

pg 23-24 Go into the Nature Reserves and sounds like some hiking would be allowed but no camping.
NR1 is the Wawiag flood plain
NR2 Affects lakes up and down the Knife lake area

pg 19 mentions installing thunder boxes for some high use campsites near entry points

That's enough for me now, finish reading it later


The Tower (and other artifacts) don't bother me so much. It's a history of the park. If the park ever feels it's unsafe, then it should come down.



  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
intrepid_camper
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1348
Location: Northern Minnesota
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Reply #4 - Oct 18th, 2013 at 5:20pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I gave up waiting for the "plan" to load on a bad connection so have a question for those who've read it....is the "plan" suggesting that there will not be camping sites on the Man Chain and Blackstone?  Or is it just the areas that are adjacent to the pristine rock cliff environments they want to safe-guard?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Magicpaddler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1321
Location: Chicago Burbs
Joined: Jan 7th, 2004
Re: 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Reply #5 - Oct 18th, 2013 at 5:27pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
As they have kicked the trappers out the portages that they have maintained for years will close up.  I have found and used several of those portages and think they add to the park.  Trapping should continue.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Solus
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 967
Location: Northern Minnesota
Joined: Oct 6th, 2006
Re: 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Reply #6 - Oct 18th, 2013 at 11:59pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
My reading of it is that campsites will be closed only in the areas shaded on the map, which are small sections of the shoreline of the mentioned lakes. Unfortunately it looks to include my favorite site on Emerald.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jim J Solo
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1195
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Joined: Apr 6th, 2007
Re: 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Reply #7 - Oct 19th, 2013 at 4:58pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Magicpaddler wrote on Oct 18th, 2013 at 5:27pm:
As they have kicked the trappers out, the portages that they have maintained for years will close up.  I have found and used several of those portages and think they add to the park.  Trapping should continue.


My reading of 7.9 Wildlife Management pg 37, sounds like the none LLCFN native trappers lose their traplines but the traplines can be tranfered to LLCFN natives. No?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jim J Solo
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1195
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Joined: Apr 6th, 2007
Re: 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Reply #8 - Oct 19th, 2013 at 5:16pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
middle pg 28 says they don't plan a new east entry into the park. They site several reasons but sounds like maintaining the road is the biggest issue. Plus the lack of use of the existing northern entry points.

All in all, not many changes. They were moving the Mack Lake Fly-in entry to another lake nearby, but it seemed the qouta stayed the same.

I wasn't aware there was so much trapping in Q, even though I've run across their trapping materials, even boats, stashed at lakes. Sounds like they're allowed some discreetly placed cabins too.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jim J Solo
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1195
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Joined: Apr 6th, 2007
Re: 2013 Quetico Preliminary Management Plan
Reply #9 - Oct 19th, 2013 at 5:32pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
intrepid_camper wrote on Oct 18th, 2013 at 5:20pm:
I gave up waiting for the "plan" to load on a bad connection so have a question for those who've read it....is the "plan" suggesting that there will not be camping sites on the Man Chain and Blackstone?  Or is it just the areas that are adjacent to the pristine rock cliff environments they want to safe-guard?


I_C My post yesterday was wrong to mention Knife. I'm not very familiar with that part of the Q. I've never been in through PP or Cache, maybe someday.

I should have said Blackstone, Other Man, Ottertrack, This Man, Littlerock, Emerald, Fisher, and Sheldan.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top