Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 53 54 [55] 56 57 ... 107 Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24) (Read 182236 times)
TomT
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1052
Location: Chicago Burbs
Joined: Aug 26th, 2007
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #540 - Jul 12th, 2018 at 11:33pm
 
Seeing the milky way in the BW/Quetico is always a real highlight for me.  Being in the Chicago burbs you can count the stars that you see in the sky.  Nothing better than a moonless inky black high pressure night up north.   Smiley
« Last Edit: Jul 13th, 2018 at 2:12am by TomT »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jimbo
Moderator
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 4599
Location: Florida
Joined: Oct 6th, 2002
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #541 - Jul 13th, 2018 at 1:12pm
 
And they just keep coming!  Nice job, Kerry!

Jimbo   Cool
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Ranger
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 848
Location: West MI
Joined: Oct 16th, 2002
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #542 - Jul 13th, 2018 at 5:32pm
 
Kerry, how do you get shots of the stars like that? I'd be interested to know the general settings for those shots; it's not something I've ever tried before.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PhantomJug
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 2855
Location: 1/2 way there
Joined: Feb 12th, 2003
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #543 - Jul 13th, 2018 at 5:45pm
 
Jim Brandenburg, eat your heart out.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Kerry
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 427
Location: Toronto
Joined: May 13th, 2010
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #544 - Jul 13th, 2018 at 7:08pm
 
Ranger wrote on Jul 13th, 2018 at 5:32pm:
Kerry, how do you get shots of the stars like that? I'd be interested to know the general settings for those shots; it's not something I've ever tried before.

I'm assuming that you'd be shooting with a DSLR or equivalent mirrorless like the Sony aRiii or, as in my case the Fuji X-t1.  First thing you'd want is a fast wide angle lens.  My image was done with an 18 mm (full frame equiv.), f/2.  The wide angle part is for obvious reason - you want to capture an expanse of sky but the really important bit is  f/2.8 or faster because without that you won't be able to capture enough light without a really, really long exposure.  Focusing can be a bit tricky.  The lens wants to be focused to infinity but modern DSLR lens settings go beyond infinity (don't ask me what that means!) so it is best to find where infinity is on your particular lens in the daylight and mark it.  Okay, so you've got your camera and lens.  Don't forget a good sturdy tripod because you will be using long exposures.  There are different ways to capture the Milky Way but you have to remember that beyond around thirty seconds exposure time, you start to get star trails ( the earth is moving,) which makes the whole thing look out of focus.  You can take one shot, say f/2, 15 sec, ISO 3200 and, depending on the quality of the lens, it will come out pretty well (there are charts available that give you suggested settings based on the lens aperture.)  But you will also get quite a bit of colour noise.  However, if the image is just being shown on Instagram or the net no one will probably notice.  What I do, is shoot 15 to 20 images using the numbers above with a one second delay between each.  Then I use a program called Starry Landscape Stacker, which, in post, automatically aligns all the images and, by stacking them, reduces the noise to almost zero.  So that's basically it.  Now in the case of this photograph, I wanted to get a nice foreground, so knowing where the Milky Way would appear, I set my camera up for the shot and about ¾ of an hour after sunset, shot the foreground at appropriate settings and focus with an ISO around 400.  I left my camera set up, changed the settings for the night sky shot and came back around 11 pm and did the night sky shooting.  Back home, I blended my foreground and background in post, which is not as difficult as it sounds but does require some experience with Photoshop.  That all being said, the best thing to do is give it a try. The minimum you'll need is a DSLR camera, a fast wide angle lens and a tripod.  You want to be shooting in RAW rather than Jpeg because you need as much information as the camera can give you.  Start by getting it all with one shot and experiment. When you get your first exposure it will feel like magic.  And there is nothing like being out under the sky in the middle of the night in the middle of nowhere!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kerry
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 427
Location: Toronto
Joined: May 13th, 2010
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #545 - Jul 13th, 2018 at 7:15pm
 
TomT wrote on Jul 12th, 2018 at 11:33pm:
Seeing the milky way in the BW/Quetico is always a real highlight for me.  Being in the Chicago burbs you can count the stars that you see in the sky.  Nothing better than a moonless inky black high pressure night up north.   Smiley

You have probably noticed that even out away from all the light pollution, the Milky Way doesn't appear to our eye the way it does to the camera.  Those colours are actually there but, for the most part, too subtle for the human eye to pick up.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TomT
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1052
Location: Chicago Burbs
Joined: Aug 26th, 2007
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #546 - Jul 14th, 2018 at 1:18am
 
Kerry wrote on Jul 13th, 2018 at 7:15pm:
TomT wrote on Jul 12th, 2018 at 11:33pm:
Seeing the milky way in the BW/Quetico is always a real highlight for me.  Being in the Chicago burbs you can count the stars that you see in the sky.  Nothing better than a moonless inky black high pressure night up north.   Smiley

You have probably noticed that even out away from all the light pollution, the Milky Way doesn't appear to our eye the way it does to the camera.  Those colours are actually there but, for the most part, too subtle for the human eye to pick up.


I didn't know that.  It sure would be cool if we saw it like your pic.  Per looking at the moon phase for September I should have 3 excellent nights for star gazing.  I'll try my best to see the colors.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TomT
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1052
Location: Chicago Burbs
Joined: Aug 26th, 2007
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #547 - Jul 14th, 2018 at 12:32pm
 
Damn, dude.  Nice work.  I aspired to this level of photography at one point.  Publish a book for Pete's sake.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kerry
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 427
Location: Toronto
Joined: May 13th, 2010
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #548 - Jul 14th, 2018 at 3:50pm
 
TomT wrote on Jul 14th, 2018 at 12:32pm:
Damn, dude.  Nice work.  I aspired to this level of photography at one point.  Publish a book for Pete's sake.


Thanks for the compliments.  That's my dream.  Not ready yet.  Last year was only my second season out with a "real" camera.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PhantomJug
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 2855
Location: 1/2 way there
Joined: Feb 12th, 2003
Re: 2017 - Picture of the day - POD (cont. 24)
Reply #549 - Jul 16th, 2018 at 6:41pm
 
Ok, I think my hunch has been confirmed.  Kerry is an Elf and the chief photog in Rivendell.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 53 54 [55] 56 57 ... 107
Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top