Post Reply

Please type the characters exactly as they appear in the image,
without the last 4 characters.
The characters must be typed in the same order,
and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
                       
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 20000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features
Topic Summary - Displaying 10 post(s). Click here to show all
Posted by: Preacher
Posted on: Sep 20th, 2010 at 3:41pm
Quote Quote
That's one slick pfd MasterT!  If I had the cash.

Agree with the re-arm kit & short trips.  If you pop it, leave it popped for the remaider of the trip.
Posted by: mastertangler
Posted on: Sep 20th, 2010 at 3:36pm
Quote Quote
I went from the pull type inflatables to a hydrostatic (water pressure required). The Mustang survival hydrostatic inflatable meets coast guard requirements for an offshore pfd. With 35lbs of flotation you should be in good shape.

I find it hard to tolerate a regular PFD and likely would not wear it. As it is now I don't feel right until I hear that "click" when I snap the mustang  in place. After that I forget I have it on, even on a hot day. On portages it's compact and I stow it inside my seat.
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Yes, I know it's a bit pricey but for me it helps to make my tripping experiences better (as in more comfortable) and safer.

I have never really considered a re-arm kit a requirement for short term trips to the Quetico. Do something more extensive and it would probably be wise to have one. If you struggle with wearing a regular PFD consider the Mustang.
Posted by: Preacher
Posted on: Sep 20th, 2010 at 3:00pm
Quote Quote
solotripper wrote on Sep 20th, 2010 at 2:31pm:
Quote:
Just in case you ever see me in a canoeing photo without a life vest on, it's because I wear an inflatable belt preserver.


I'm not confidant a inflatable belt PFD would give the same benefits of a vest type PFD, but for those who find the vest types cumbersome or want to work on their tan, a little extra buoyancy is better than nothing.

Agree.  Unless it automatically inflates.  Who's going to pull the rip-cord if you knock your head?
Posted by: solotripper
Posted on: Sep 20th, 2010 at 2:31pm
Quote Quote
Quote:
Just in case you ever see me in a canoeing photo without a life vest on, it's because I wear an inflatable belt preserver.


I'm not confidant a inflatable belt PFD would give the same benefits of a vest type PFD, but for those who find the vest types cumbersome or want to work on their tan, a little extra buoyancy is better than nothing.

The wife said he came up 3x before going under. This tells me he was a fighter. While you can never be certain in situations like this, that little extra buoyancy might of made the difference between a close call, and a tragic but likely avoidable drowning  Sad
Posted by: BWCABlogLady
Posted on: Sep 18th, 2010 at 8:59pm
Quote Quote
What a tragic story indeed. I find it odd that none of the reports given said there were other people there. They made it sound like he was alone and somehow pressed a button to activate the beacon.

What an awful experience for everyone involved.  It's so sad people won't wear their life vests.

Just in case you ever see me in a canoeing photo without a life vest on, it's because I wear an inflatable belt preserver.
Posted by: arnesr
Posted on: Sep 17th, 2010 at 9:07pm
Quote Quote
wally wrote on Sep 17th, 2010 at 8:54pm:
So he's still not recovered?
Wonder how long they look?


(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Ontario Provincial Police have recovered a Duluth man’s body from a lake in Quetico Provincial Park.

Darrell Cellers, 65, apparently drowned after his canoe overturned during windy weather on McAree Lake. The lake is about 25 miles north of Ely, across the international border.

The OPP began its search Thursday after learning that an emergency GPS locator had been deployed in the area. Cellers’ body was found late Saturday morning.
Posted by: wally
Posted on: Sep 17th, 2010 at 8:54pm
Quote Quote
So he's still not recovered?
Wonder how long they look?
Posted by: kentuckian
Posted on: Sep 17th, 2010 at 8:31pm
Quote Quote
The wife said he always wears one when he is on the water. She said he had taken it of for some reason and didn't say why.Possible he may have forgotten to put it back on. She still had hers on when it overturned and she was holding to the canue and the current pulled her out into the lake.
Posted by: jjcanoeguide
Posted on: Sep 17th, 2010 at 4:27pm
Quote Quote
Preacher wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 6:32pm:
Tragic situation.  I've read many of these reports and too few mention if a PFD was being worn.  The media needs to get this information, just as they do when there's a car wreck.


Ageed on the reporting.  Reading through the lines though, if they were dragging for the body, meaning that it was under water, he either:

1) wasn't wearing a working PFD.
2) became entrapped under water.

It would be nice if the reporter actually investigated enough to determine if it was easily preventable by wearing a good PFD or not.

Posted by: Kenny B
Posted on: Sep 14th, 2010 at 7:12pm
Quote Quote
I agree that we all must wear a good, functional, PFD.  I would not dare to venture out on a lake without one.   However, we don't know for sure if this man was wearing his or not.   At any rate, I have been looking at pictures from canoe trips for years and I always make note of when someone is not wearing their PFD.  And surely enough, more time than not, people are out in the middle of the lake and paddling with their PFD used as a back rest or just not wearing it for whatever reason.  This is a shame, akin to not wearing a seatbelt while driving.

My heart and sympathy goes out to the wife and family of this poor man who perhaps made a careless mistake that cost him his life.
 
   ^Top