25 Landing nets vs fish grippers (Read 28776 times)
Kingfisher
Moderator
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 8th, 2004
Landing nets vs fish grippers
Feb 10th, 2006 at 5:22am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I have mixed feelings about taking and using landing nets on canoe trips. So far I have never taken one and here's why. Generally, fish that I'm not going to eat or photogragh get released without entering the canoe. For the most part, only the largest fish need to be netted so you should take a pretty big net to do the job....bigger than I've been willing to tote along. When I've seen people with nets, usually they are much too small to safely contain a trophy fish. If you don't have a net that's large enough, you will harm the fish and make a successful release more doubtful. I realize that if you are not comfortable handling toothy fish a net is a good option, but do take one that's large enough.
I'm beginning to think that one of (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) might be a reasonable option for landing those trophies. Any thoughts?
« Last Edit: Feb 11th, 2006 at 5:14pm by Kingfisher »  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
DentonDoc
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: Central Texas
Joined: Dec 27th, 2003
Re: Landing nets
Reply #1 - Feb 10th, 2006 at 6:03am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
I'm beginning to think that one of (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) might be a reasonable option for landing those trophies. Any thoughts?

I've taken something similar for the past 2 years ... maybe not quite as heavy duty as the one pictured, but the same general design.  The one I take also has an integrated scale built in.  It obviously packs small compared to a landing net. It is my opinion that it is less stressful on the fish (for catch and release), since it is possible to extract your hook without ever touching the fish.  (Plus, you don't have to extract your hook from the net.)

I'd recommend attaching it to your canoe with a longer lanyard of some kind.  Although I've not had it wrenched out of my hand yet, sometimes your grip on the handle can be a little awkward.  I'd hate to see this and a fish headed to the bottom because of an inopportune fish flop matched with a poor grip.

Of course ... it is going again this year.

dd
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
The_Beaver
Moderator
Offline



Posts: 1131
Location: Middleton, WI
Joined: Jan 10th, 2005
Re: Landing nets
Reply #2 - Feb 10th, 2006 at 1:05pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
I'm beginning to think that one of (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) might be a reasonable option for landing those trophies. Any thoughts?


A BogaGrip is all I use in the Q.

I originally bought it for Steelhead and Salmon fishing on Lake Michigan tributaries. I carry it on a long loop of parachute cord around my neck...hangs down to below my waist...but I clip the Boga to my wader suspender strap to keep it out of the way as I fly fish. When I catch a fish I "grip" him...and then can let it swim in the current on the cord while I put my fly rod down...take the hook out...whatever.

They are awesome but make sure you buy an authentic Boga. Knockoffs from even reputable manufacturers (e.g. Rapala) aren't as good.  The key is the holding power of the grip. I've landed big fish (30+#) with my Boga and have never had one shake loose.

Plus, the Boga has a built in scale...kinda nice.

In the Q I keep it clipped to my tackle bag or thwart...until I need it to grip a monster waldo or laker Grin

If I wasn't a complete moron I would insert a picture here ....I'll work on it. (inserting a picture, that is; I don't have to work at being a moron).

Good Luck,

The Beaver
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jimbo
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 4599
Location: Florida
Joined: Oct 6th, 2002
Re: Landing nets
Reply #3 - Feb 10th, 2006 at 1:14pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
You guys are right on the mark with that tool! 

Tripper showed me his a couple years ago &, after watching him in action, I just had to have it.  Just as dd says, I often keep mine on a lanyard as it can easily get away from you.  An alternative is to twist the attached cord around your wrist; that approach seems to work well for me, too.  Besides, I prefer to keep the lanyard on my more expensive GPS.  Either one of those items is a goner if dropped.

I find the Bogagrip tool is easy to pack & does a good job of immobilizing & keeping "big toothy" away from fingers while I work with the needle nose pliers.  It has served me well in safely landing & releasing 20+ pound Northerns & Lake Trout.  It often allows you to release the fish quicker than you can with a net (due to hook, fin, & gill tangles).

I highly recommend its use & never bother with a net anymore, myself.

Jimbo   8)
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Old Salt
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 4871
Location: Crossville, TN
Joined: Jun 17th, 2004
Re: Landing nets
Reply #4 - Feb 10th, 2006 at 2:31pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Since the title of this thread is "landing nets", I felt it appropriate to have at least one post favoring them. I take a collapsable net with nylon mesh. It fits nicely under pack straps along one side of pack, for travel, weighs almost nothing, yet is big enough for any fish I've ever sees brought to canoe. I only use it on bigger fish, as I prefer to unhook & release without bringing fish onboard. Wink Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
The_Beaver
Moderator
Offline



Posts: 1131
Location: Middleton, WI
Joined: Jan 10th, 2005
Re: Landing nets
Reply #5 - Feb 10th, 2006 at 3:20pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
I only use it on bigger fish, as I prefer to unhook & release without bringing fish onboard. Wink Wink


Agreed. And the Boga really shines here, too. No need to boat the fish if you don't want to.

One other advantage I like with the Boga-- unhooking fish, whether in the water or out, is fast and easy...with no hooks to tangle in the net.

And just as OS does with his net, I only use the Boga on bigger fish anyway. Waldos for the pan get personal attention, i.e. the grasp of my right hand.Grin

To each his own...

The Beaver
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Snow_Dog
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1858
Location: Twin Cities
Joined: Jul 11th, 2003
Re: Landing nets
Reply #6 - Feb 10th, 2006 at 4:14pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Looks like a great idea for me. 

I bring a collapsible net like O_S does and yes it's plenty big, but I just HATE using it because of the hassle factor.  I'm very comfortable landing any big fish except a 15lb.+ pike by hand and if it gets away boatside (infrequent, but it happens) it's no big deal because I would have released it regardless.  I'm the opposite of some of you, almost the only time I do use my net is when I plan to invite a smaller fish to DINNER.  In that case, I'm taking no chances on losing the fish canoeside!!

This boga grip looks intriguing because I'd think if I owned one I could ditch the scale AND the hated net.  I'll still probably land a lot of fish by hand, but this should do nicely when I want a more secure option.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Snow_Dog
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1858
Location: Twin Cities
Joined: Jul 11th, 2003
Re: Landing nets
Reply #7 - Feb 10th, 2006 at 4:16pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Quote:
Waldos for the pan get personal attention, i.e. the grasp of my right hand.Grin

To each his own...

The Beaver


Hmmmm, I think I'm not going to touch this one at all.  Different strokes for different folks!!!   Grin  Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
pikeman
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 26
Location: Canton, Ohio
Joined: Dec 16th, 2005
Re: Landing nets
Reply #8 - Feb 10th, 2006 at 4:31pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
My brother and I take a musky cradle and find that it works absolutely wonderful for C&R of 10+ lb pike (we generally don't bother to net anything smaller).  The design is basically two 5' poles with maybe 3' of netting between them.  You guide the fish into the cradle, pull the poles together, then she is trapped.

I don't know how to insert a pic, so here is a link if you are interested to see what one looks like: 

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

We have found that the cradle works absolutely awesome for C&R.  We've boated (from canoe) pike up to 45" and been able to release all of them with no damage.  Any of you guys that have seen a 10+ lb pike start flopping in the bottom of your canoe know that this is a bad thing for the fish, and dangerous thing for the fisherman (3 trebles being ripped violently around your legs and feet!).  With the cradle, I raise the fish out of the water and rest the handles perpendicular   to the canoe's axis on the canoe's gunwales.  The fish can flop all it wants and it receives no damage.  It's also easy to unhook for fish with the cradle sitting right in front of you.... almost like a table.

A fringle benefit is that it would double and a pretty descent stretcher if you ever needed it!  It's also pretty good for carrying 10 paddles across a portage.

In all of my trips since 1991, I have never seen another group that used a cradle.  This is probably because they are pretty useless/unnecessary for bass/walleye/trout, and only really useful for larger pike.

- Dave



  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
The_Beaver
Moderator
Offline



Posts: 1131
Location: Middleton, WI
Joined: Jan 10th, 2005
Re: Landing nets
Reply #9 - Feb 10th, 2006 at 6:01pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) is a picture of the Boga in action.

The Beaver

« Last Edit: Feb 10th, 2006 at 7:04pm by The_Beaver »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top