Guest Message
Hi there Guest,

It looks like you are enjoying reading our forum, so why don't you register an account with us to stop seeing this message and benefit from many more features. Registration is easy and will only take you a few minutes.

If you already have an account with us, then click here to log in.

Thank you,

db

 25 Landing nets vs fish grippers (Read 28796 times)
Ancient_Angler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 353
Joined: Apr 21st, 2006
Re: Landing nets vs fish grippers
Reply #50 - Jan 26th, 2007 at 10:59pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Gosh, I'm late jumping in this thread. Some good thoughts and I'm not going to elaborate. Yet, I think the "grippers," even the really good ones like Boga, are hard on fish and heavy.

In Quetico, I've landed 15-pound lakers, 18-pound pike, 12-pound walleyes, 6-pound smallies by hand. (And I don't lip the pike or walleyes). Some who do not know me (maybe those who do as well) will think I'm just bragging, but I've got pictures as well.

Bottom line, grabbers and nets are simply one more thing to carry.

Tim
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Snow_Dog
Voyageur
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 1858
Location: Twin Cities
Joined: Jul 11th, 2003
Correction!
Reply #51 - Jan 27th, 2007 at 12:10am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I whiffed on which fish gripper I used and threw away.  I had looked at 2 of them, and remembered the wrong one.   Embarrassed  Might have been easier to remember what I used if I hadn't thrown it out as fast as I possibly could.

So, my apologies to the fine folks at Rapala, I have no idea whether their product is any good or not, but it sounds as if others have had good results with it.

Berkley should have been the object of my displeasure with this waste of raw materials (Pocket Lip Grip):

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

My reasoning behind the purchase was that if a $9.99 plastic gripper could handle some nice fish, this one should do at least as well.

Nice theory, but it didn't hold up (literally).

Sorry for any confusion.   Embarrassed Embarrassed
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kanoes
Ex Member


Re: Landing nets vs fish grippers
Reply #52 - Jan 27th, 2007 at 1:42am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
$10 dollar gripper from cabelas's.   it has my vote.  the good old boy who came up with it (somewhere down south) obviously lipped alot of cats with it before he marketed it.  i think its an efficient design, it floats...and its cheap!  its worked well for me (i prefer to keep the beasts OUT of the canoe.  sure...it has kmart written all over it (appearances), but it works!  hell, save the $110 of what yould shell out for a Boga and spend it on more important stuff!  like .....qty.3,  2 piece berkley lightening rods....perhaps?  oh yeah....thats just cheap old me talking....i somehow still manage to trip with an antiquated, monsterously heavy, old town penobscot, 16 ft., 58 unGodly pounds!   how could i possibly do the bw without kevlar?  somehow i do. (a jab)
Smiley  Jan
« Last Edit: Jan 27th, 2007 at 3:00am by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
quetikurt
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 22
Location: Ringgold, GA
Joined: Apr 10th, 2011
Re: Landing nets vs fish grippers
Reply #53 - Apr 23rd, 2011 at 7:37pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Ancient discussion I know, but I thought I'd share another landing option that works very well. It's called a "Fish Handler Glove" and it's made by Lindy. Not sure what the material is made of, but it's extremely effective for grabbing all species of fish........even slippery lakers. The only drawback is with large fish that you can't grab behind the head, however, those fish they can still be "tailed" quite easily. They also protect your hands from dorsel fins and sharp gill plates and work exceptionally well when catching & releasing numbers of walleye. They cost about $20 and we use them to land 90% of the fish we catch. My partner and I each carry a large, left hand glove at all times as it eliminates having to toss a lip gripping tool (or net) back and forth in the canoe. Won't leave home without it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: Landing nets vs fish grippers
Reply #54 - Apr 27th, 2011 at 3:43pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I have been leery of landing fish, especially northerns, ever since I reached down with a pair of channel locks to remove a magnum rapala (the kind with the metal lips and big hooks) from a 26" hammerhandle and that buggar jumped and deposited the forward hook all the way through my palm. Fortunately the fish got off or it would of been a real mess. I was also lucky it went all the way through and triple lucky I didn't drop the channel locks because that's what I used to crimp the barb down. I got off rather lightly.

I picked up one of those Lindy gloves but I am trying to figure out how to get it on while I have a fish on the line. I would like to employ it on this summers solo but it seems awkward at best as you need the other hand to put it on. You know, the hand that is holding the rod with the angry fish on the end. I can't picture it.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
quetikurt
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 22
Location: Ringgold, GA
Joined: Apr 10th, 2011
Re: Landing nets vs fish grippers
Reply #55 - Apr 27th, 2011 at 7:31pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Granted, slightly awkward, but I can honestly say we've never lost a fish boatside as a result of sliding on the glove. The newer version has a velcro tab and is slightly more constricted around the wrist, but the original version can actually be slipped on while it's laying on the bottom of the canoe. Even with the new model, while holding the rod with your right hand, we use the left hand to position the glove between the right hand thumb and the rod butt, then simply slip the left hand in.  Keep in mind, most fish are somewhat wore down at boatside. Besides, I don't like boating any fish that's still "green" as they're more prone to getting injured.....especially in a net. Considering you have one of these gloves I'd highly encourage you to give it a try this year. I also take a Boga that we occasionally use to land and/or weigh large lakers & pike, but almost all walleye, pike and lakers are landed with the glove. Smallies are typically lipped. I think the best attribute is that you don't have to manuever the fish boatside to get a shot at an open mouth for the lip gripper. If you can touch it, you got it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jaximus
Senior Member
Offline



Posts: 343
Location: wisconsin
Joined: May 12th, 2010
Re: Landing nets vs fish grippers
Reply #56 - Apr 27th, 2011 at 8:15pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
i use pretty light tackle and tend to fight the fish longer than most people. although this might wear out fish a bit, what is the point of fishing if you are just going to winch them in with heavy line? the most exciting part of the fish catching experience is fighting a fish. why do you think largemouth bass are the top game fish? they fight really well!

with that said, i never ever ever boat a green fish. its dangerous for me and dangerous for the fish. because i only boat fish after a bit of a fight, i go gloveless and grab them with my bare hands. i grab right at the back of the gill plates where there is a bit of hollow area before the meaty part of the back starts. i grab bass by the lip. barehanded makes me feel manly. and what is better than a roughed up thumb because youve been catching fish all day? nothing i can think of. occasionally you will lose a fish with this method (i lost a walleye in the 30-35" range due to a slippage of grip), but thats life and you move on.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: Landing nets vs fish grippers
Reply #57 - Apr 27th, 2011 at 8:44pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
There is a little something to be said for fighting fish with heavier line and that is you get to feel how strong they are. You can actually put a little weight on them and can feel the power. I like doing that with carp and I also like having a 50+ lb amberjack on with 80lb mono. Serious fun once you get past the bruising part.

The largest walleye I have ever hooked hit around noon in 15ft of water in the St. Clair river and clobbered a grandma musky lure. At least 12lbs it bounced off a salt water gaff twice before coming unglued. That is some tough scales as this was a serious gaff. I wished I'd had a net. Probably better it got off...........the meat would likely of been as tough as well. What a fish.

Once in a while a fish comes along where your hand is not going to span the distance across the back and under the gills. Or maybe you just barely get a grip and he thrashes free. I'm pretty much sold on the boga. I had actually thought to use the glove in conjunction with the boga. I'm thinking one of the biggest threats to my trip is a tore up hand. Fish day after day and hour after hour and sooner or later there is likely to be a close call especially with so many northerns around. Wear a big plug one time and you get a little careful.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
MuleLars
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 332
Location: Madison
Joined: Apr 20th, 2009
Re: Landing nets vs fish grippers
Reply #58 - Apr 27th, 2011 at 8:45pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
If you want to be REAL manly, lip your walleyes and NP with your bare hand  Wink Shocked
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jaximus
Senior Member
Offline



Posts: 343
Location: wisconsin
Joined: May 12th, 2010
Re: Landing nets vs fish grippers
Reply #59 - Apr 27th, 2011 at 9:08pm
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
mastertangler wrote on Apr 27th, 2011 at 8:44pm:
Once in a while a fish comes along where your hand is not going to span the distance across the back and under the gills.

lucky for my i was blessed with some monster hands. i could palm a basketball in 5th grade. this spring i grabbed a 44.5 inch muskie bare handed. i dont think i will come across something bigger than that because i only fish freshwater.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top