db wrote on Oct 1
st, 2013 at 6:33am:
I much prefer to read other's impressions of places AFTER I've been there
Canoe season is drawing to a close in BW/Q, so for many of us, sometime over the next few months it'll be time to start planning next year's trip(s).
For me, that means choosing a calendar slot and route, then searching PCD, the portage databases and the forums for info on the campsites, portages, and lakes. Then I make custom 1:50000 maps of the route and plan out a day-by-day itinerary.
My itineraries aren't meant to be slavishly followed. Rather, they're sets of benchmarks: if I choose or am forced to delay or accelerate part of a trip, I know where I might have to cut the time short or where I might get to spend extra time if I like the area. And I always know where most of the good campsites are.
I also like to use the itineraries as scratch pads for info that might be of use. Like for the Baird to Unnamed portage: "The high route (preferred, not shown on map) starts at a small landing 200 m S of the knee deep bog route takeout"
Does this take all the joy of discovery out of tripping? Quite the opposite: Once all my options have been clearly laid out beforehand, I never have to do much thinking and can spend my valuable canoe time living "in the moment". A quick look at the topo map and you know pretty much what a given lake or river looks like before you get there anyway, so in one sense there isn't much discovery left regardless of how much planning you do. But the weather and seasons are always changing, and the small scale details of the landscape are always unpredictable, so in another sense, it's almost all discovery, no matter how many trip reports you read in advance.
What approach do other people take to canoe trip planning?