10 Fishy Fish? (taste that is) (Read 7194 times)
db
Web-lackey
Inukshuk
Voyageur
Offline



Posts: 5465
Location: Just off the beaten path.
Joined: Sep 14th, 2002
Re: Fishy Fish? (taste that is)
Reply #10 - Apr 11th, 2014 at 6:28am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Old Salt wrote on Apr 10th, 2014 at 11:18pm:
Not to sidetrack this great discussion of culinary art (which should probably be in the cooking forum), I'll share my favorite recipe for cooking carp. After proper cleaning, throwing out the unusable and undesirable parts, take what's left (if any) and bake it on a cedar  plank. When thoroughly cooked, remove the carp, and serve the plank. Wink

I could really go for a few spring bullheads right now. When people say fish and mention a delicate flavor, that's what comes to mind for me. Lightly floured. Mom probably cooked 'em in lard. Can you still buy lard?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: Fishy Fish? (taste that is)
Reply #11 - Apr 11th, 2014 at 11:04am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
jaximus wrote on Apr 11th, 2014 at 1:09am:
i suspect that the fishy tasting ones are the pike. i ALWAYS clean my knife between filleting and skinning. pike have the worst slime (moreso in winter) and that has a really bad fishy taste. making sure you dont run a dirty(slimey) knife through clean meat is important.


whats the old saying.........youth is wasted on the young Wink.......I can never decide which fish I like best in the north country. When I eat walleye I think that it is the best. Then I eat a pike and marvel at the firm white meat, and of course then there is the lake trout, simply sublime.........

Fishy strong flavor >> Pike? you can't be serious Jax. They are wonderful and my mouth is salivating like Pavy boys dogs just thinking about them. You clean your knife from outside the fish to inside? I suppose I could be wrong but my guess is you would be unable to tell my pile of filets from yours (except of course mine would be lots bigger pieces and that would give the game away  Grin )
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
pikeman
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 26
Location: Canton, Ohio
Joined: Dec 16th, 2005
Re: Fishy Fish? (taste that is)
Reply #12 - Apr 12th, 2014 at 2:29am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
I too agree - - the strong fish taste usually is related to not removing the fat from the fish.  As stated above, the dark looking red stuff is fat and one should strive to remove all of it from the fillet.

Just like people, you can see differences in the amount of fat on fish of the same species.  If one just does the standard fillet & skin job, there can be quite a bit of difference in how much red fat is present right along the lateral line of the fish.  As MT suggested, take the extra time to cut out this section of red meat and you will definitely notice the difference in taste.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
db
Web-lackey
Inukshuk
Voyageur
Offline



Posts: 5465
Location: Just off the beaten path.
Joined: Sep 14th, 2002
Re: Fishy Fish? (taste that is)
Reply #13 - Apr 12th, 2014 at 5:56am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
Doesn't most if not all of the lateral line come out anyway when you remove the pin bones ... depending on how you do it?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
mastertangler
Inukshuk
Offline



Posts: 3111
Location: florida
Joined: Feb 1st, 2010
Re: Fishy Fish? (taste that is)
Reply #14 - Apr 12th, 2014 at 11:22am
Quote Quote Print Post Print Post  
db wrote on Apr 12th, 2014 at 5:56am:
Doesn't most if not all of the lateral line come out anyway when you remove the pin bones ... depending on how you do it?


good point and the answer is yes and no.......... or perhaps the best answer is "it depends".

Part of the reason that smaller fish seem to taste better is their fat deposits are usually quite minimal, in small walleyes it is often non existent. The bigger the fish the more likely some additional knife strokes will be required.

here is a story that might illustrate my point Roll Eyes (not another story)

I became interested in fishing the overnight salt water charter boats some 20 years ago. That first trip results for my Dad and I were rather slim but we did manage a twin pair of 40lb Amberjacks (if you think your tough you don't know Jack). I asked a handful of guys on the boat if they were good to eat and to a man they replied that "they're good smoked". Whenever I hear that a fish is only good smoked the impression I am left with is the fish isn't fit for a dog.

Nevertheless we kept the mid size jacks. One we left with an artist friend (Bruce) who had let me park my rig at their place. He actually seemed quite pleased to have it. Hmmmm.

We got the fish home and put a knife to it. These fish have a deposit of fat and blood and their sides like nothing I had seen before. The whole side of the fish was layered in about 1/2" of yuk. I carefully trimmed it away and cut the plentiful meat into cubes and proceeded to fry up a batch.

I will never forget what happened next. My Dad and I were seated across from each other with a big pile of fish between us. We each grabbed a piece and as is my custom I broke a steaming piece open and gave it a whiff. "Doesn't smell bad" I quizzically commented. We each took a bite, there was a long pause, and then our eyes lock simultaneously.........My Dad shot one of his all time best lines......"We have to go back to Bruces and get our other fish"

To this day Amberjack get a bad rap. I believe it is because of a lousy cleaning job. I have served Amberjack on many an occasion including to large groups of over 20 and more often than not I am asked what kind of fish they are eating (Jack has a texture much like chicken).

Bottom line? Small fish don't worry about it but on the bigger fish take the time to remove the fatty deposits, it is easy enough to do.   
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 

 
  « The Put-In ‹ Board  ^Top